* [LTP] Split UCLIBC and UCLINUX test cases
@ 2012-01-09 11:08 Markos Chandras
2012-01-09 17:19 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Markos Chandras @ 2012-01-09 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list
Hello,
Right now the use of UCLINUX implies the use of __UCLIBC__ as well. Even
though this is true from UCLINUX's perspective, it is not valid from the
uclibc's one. A non-uclinux system can perfectly work with uclibc. What
I suggest is to keep the UCLINUX option as is, but also add a new option
called UCLIBC which will enable us to avoid all the restrictions imposed
by the use of UCLINUX macro (especially the disabled tests in
testcases/kernel/systecall/Makefile).
--
markos
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Split UCLIBC and UCLINUX test cases
2012-01-09 11:08 [LTP] Split UCLIBC and UCLINUX test cases Markos Chandras
@ 2012-01-09 17:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-01-09 17:34 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2012-01-09 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp-list; +Cc: Markos Chandras
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 683 bytes --]
On Monday 09 January 2012 06:08:48 Markos Chandras wrote:
> Right now the use of UCLINUX implies the use of __UCLIBC__ as well. Even
> though this is true from UCLINUX's perspective, it is not valid from the
> uclibc's one. A non-uclinux system can perfectly work with uclibc. What
> I suggest is to keep the UCLINUX option as is, but also add a new option
> called UCLIBC which will enable us to avoid all the restrictions imposed
> by the use of UCLINUX macro (especially the disabled tests in
> testcases/kernel/systecall/Makefile).
header/func tests should get moved to configure. we should not introduce or
rely on any new ifdefs like UCLIBC or __UCLIBC__.
-mike
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 430 bytes --]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 155 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LTP] Split UCLIBC and UCLINUX test cases
2012-01-09 17:19 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2012-01-09 17:34 ` Garrett Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Garrett Cooper @ 2012-01-09 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: ltp-list, Markos Chandras
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2012 06:08:48 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Right now the use of UCLINUX implies the use of __UCLIBC__ as well. Even
>> though this is true from UCLINUX's perspective, it is not valid from the
>> uclibc's one. A non-uclinux system can perfectly work with uclibc. What
>> I suggest is to keep the UCLINUX option as is, but also add a new option
>> called UCLIBC which will enable us to avoid all the restrictions imposed
>> by the use of UCLINUX macro (especially the disabled tests in
>> testcases/kernel/systecall/Makefile).
>
> header/func tests should get moved to configure. we should not introduce or
> rely on any new ifdefs like UCLIBC or __UCLIBC__.
+1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-09 17:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-09 11:08 [LTP] Split UCLIBC and UCLINUX test cases Markos Chandras
2012-01-09 17:19 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-01-09 17:34 ` Garrett Cooper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox