Re: [LTP] [PATCH] sched_getaffinity: fix possible fail in negative case

[Caspar Zhang <caspar@casparzhang.com>]

On 03/09/2012 01:28 PM, Caspar Zhang wrote:
> 
> in negative case:
> 
>     QUICK_TEST(sched_getaffinity(getpid()+1, len, mask));
> 
> sometimes getpid()+1 will exist if there're other processes running.
> This patch uses a different way to make sure the required pid doesn't
> exist by forking a child and terminating it. The pid of the terminated
> child will not be used for a short time and it's enough for the test to
> continue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caspar Zhang <caspar@casparzhang.com>
> ---
>  .../sched_getaffinity/sched_getaffinity01.c        |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Hmmm, I took a look at commit c8319c8 and found that Garrett added a
similar non-exist-pid case already. I guess we can simply remove the one
I tried to fix...

Thanks,
Caspar

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list