From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S8TxC-0002tW-NU for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:00:10 +0000 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1S8Tx6-0002Gp-Ld for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 10:00:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4F630EE2.60108@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:58:58 +0800 From: Wanlong Gao MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F58E36E.5000306@casparzhang.com> <4F594DE2.4040603@cn.fujitsu.com> <4F62EB70.7010400@casparzhang.com> <3985A069-7EF2-4014-9016-E0B2BB9288EE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3985A069-7EF2-4014-9016-E0B2BB9288EE@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] make mce-test a submodule Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: "andi.kleen@intel.com" , "ying.huang@intel.com" , LTP list On 03/16/2012 05:53 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mar 16, 2012, at 12:27 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote: > >> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any objections >> from you by today. >> >> >> On 03/09/2012 08:25 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >>> On 03/09/2012 12:50 AM, Caspar Zhang wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Garrett, Andi, and all: >>>> >>>> When I looked into current LTP tree, I found it a little messy due to >>>> some mce-test stuff, such as >>>> >>>> - mce-test docs goes to $TOPDIR/README, and >>>> - some mce-test files still lying under testcase/mce-test/. >>>> >>>> I think we need a cleanup for it. >>> >>> >>> yes, I think so. >>> >>>> >>>> Also an idea comes to my mind, that we can try to make mce-test a >>>> submodule of LTP. >>> >>> >>> Not a bad idea. >>> >>>> >>>> I am also thinking about the pros and cons: >>>> >>>> pro(s): >>>> - easier for code maintenance, no need to sync periodically from >>>> maintainer side >>>> >>>> con(s): >>>> - two extra steps added for LTP users, they have to do: >>>> $ git submodule init >>>> $ git submodule update >>>> to enable using mce-test. >>>> >>>> mce-test could no longer be found at kernel.org, so I cloned it from >>>> Andi's github repo, not sure if it is the right place: >>>> >>>> git://github.com/andikleen/mce-test.git >>> >>> >>> The tree seems just a few update every month now, I wonder why intel guys >>> didn't sync the commits to LTP ? >>> >>>> >>>> I have made this change to my personal LTP fork, you can review it here: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/casparant/ltp/commit/5cca17f633 >>> >>> >>> The patch loooks good. >> >> Wanlong, thanks for review. > > The goals for the patch are good and what I briefly looked over looked ok too. Can you pull certain versions of the mce-test submodule, or is it always HEAD? > I think the submodule head should be pulled by hand every time the mce tree updated. Thanks, Wanlong Gao > Thanks! > -Garrett ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list