Re: [LTP] [RFC] make mce-test a submodule

Chen Gong
2012-04-17T02:38:10Z

于 2012/4/9 14:02, Chen Gong 写道:
> 于 2012/4/9 12:03, Caspar Zhang 写道:
>> On 04/09/2012 11:10 AM, Chen Gong wrote:
>>> 于 2012/4/6 22:33, Caspar Zhang 写道:
>>>> On 03/21/2012 05:18 PM, Chen Gong wrote:
>>>>> 于 2012/3/16 22:35, Andi Kleen 写道:
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Caspar Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all, I'll merge this change to master if I don't hear any
>>>>>>> objections
>>>>>>> from you by today.
>>>>>> Fine for me. Copying Gong Chen who did most of the mce-test work
>>>>>> recently
>>>>>> too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Andi
>>>>> Oh, yes. Recently I make a big change on mce-test project and old
>>>>> structure will be reorganized.
>>>>> And I ever looked through the mce-test part in LTP. Unfortunately
>>>>> it is
>>>>> very old and can't run on
>>>>> newer kernel. I hope you can keep current disabled status in LTP and
>>>>> wait my new work is merged.
>>>>> We can talk at that time. Is it OK to you?
>>>> Hi Chen Gong, sorry for late reply, we're planning to remove old
>>>> static
>>>> coded mce-test from LTP, and use it as a submodule, which means,
>>>> mce-test won't be static-coded any more, it's always synced up with
>>>> your
>>>> upstream version, we just need to do some manual ``submodule update``
>>>> operations to checkout your version when doing a LTP release. So I'll
>>>> merge this patch in, remove all current out-of-date codes, and wait
>>>> for
>>>> your notice of mce-test's next version, so that we can include it
>>>> in our
>>>> next LTP stable release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Caspar
>>>>
>>> It's fine to me. So do you want to get a notice from me after the codes
>>> are merged or you
>>> monitor the upstream status by yourself?
>> I'd appreciate it if you can send me a mail when the codes get merged,
>> but I'll check upstream status as well from time to time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caspar
>>
> OK, I will. Now patch is in the review status, so I will tell you ASAP
> after merged.
The new patch for mce-test has been merged, but it looks a little bit wrong
during the merge procedure (all shell scripts execution right are missed).
I'm pushing Andi to fix it, so please don't add mce-test at current stage.
I will tell you when it is ready.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
resolution app monitoring today. Free.