From: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
To: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Test Project <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:19:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5005196.GXAFRqVoOG@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250727152454.682633-1-japo@linux.ibm.com>
Hi,
Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <akumar@suse.de>
nit: maybe the patch title also should not mention NTFS.
-
Avinesh
On Sunday, July 27, 2025 5:24:54 PM CEST Jan Polensky wrote:
> The test incorrectly assumes that NTFS mounts are read-only, but the mount
> command does not explicitly set the read-only flag. As a result, the test fails
> when checking `sb_flags` against `MS_RDONLY`.
>
> Old behavior:
>
> sudo LTP_SINGLE_FS_TYPE=ntfs strace -e trace=mount,statmount -o log.log -s 128 -f ./statmount02
> ...
> statmount02.c:47: TFAIL: st_mount->sb_flags (0) != MS_RDONLY (1)
> ...
>
> Relevant log excerpt:
>
> 3890601 mount("/dev/zero", "/tmp/mountBDSEqk", "ntfs", 0, NULL) = -1 ENOTBLK (Block device required)
> 3890608 mount("/dev/loop0", "/tmp/LTP_staTPRruR/mntpoint", "fuseblk", 0, "allow_other,blksize=4096,fd=4,rootmode=40000,user_id=0,group_id=0") = 0
> 3890607 statmount({size=24, mnt_id=0x80010957, param=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC}, {size=512, mask=STATMOUNT_SB_BASIC, sb_dev_major=7, sb_dev_minor=0, sb_magic=FUSE_SUPER_MAGIC, sb_flags=0}, 512, 0) = 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Polensky <japo@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Change since v1 (Thanks Cyril & thanks for the ping):
> * Removed restriction for NTFS.
>
> lib/safe_macros.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/safe_macros.c b/lib/safe_macros.c
> index 6946cc5bcb94..be04eb455d57 100644
> --- a/lib/safe_macros.c
> +++ b/lib/safe_macros.c
> @@ -942,10 +942,15 @@ int safe_mount(const char *file, const int lineno, void (*cleanup_fn)(void),
> */
> if (possibly_fuse(filesystemtype)) {
> char buf[1024];
> + const char* mount_fmt;
>
> tst_resm_(file, lineno, TINFO, "Trying FUSE...");
> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "mount.%s '%s' '%s'",
> - filesystemtype, source, target);
> + if (mountflags == MS_RDONLY)
> + mount_fmt = "mount.%s -o ro '%s' '%s'";
> + else
> + mount_fmt = "mount.%s '%s' '%s'";
> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), mount_fmt, filesystemtype,
> + source, target);
>
> rval = tst_system(buf);
> if (WIFEXITED(rval) && WEXITSTATUS(rval) == 0)
> --
> 2.50.1
>
>
>
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-27 15:24 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/1] safe_macros.c: Fix missing ro flag for FUSE NTFS mounts Jan Polensky
2025-07-29 10:19 ` Avinesh Kumar [this message]
2025-08-05 11:49 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5005196.GXAFRqVoOG@thinkpad \
--to=akumar@suse.de \
--cc=japo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox