From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SsAzN-0000we-7h for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:03:17 +0000 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1SsAzL-0002HM-Jv for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:03:17 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so5703683pbb.34 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 04:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50093AD7.9040602@casparzhang.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:02:47 +0800 From: Caspar Zhang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/2] numa_helper: get nodes with mem/cpu/both List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net On 07/20/2012 06:19 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > numa_helper has been used for syscalls testcases, which > care about nodes with memory. Based on discussion here: > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/16325 > it was deemed, that 'flag' extension would be useful, > to allow tests to ask for nodes with memory/cpu/both. > > This patch series is introducing flag to get_allowed_nodes(). > > For example, a config like this one: > # numactl -H > available: 3 nodes (2,4-5) > node 2 cpus: 0 > node 2 size: 511 MB > node 2 free: 88 MB > node 4 cpus: > node 4 size: 256 MB > node 4 free: 34 MB > node 5 cpus: > node 5 size: 255 MB > node 5 free: 59 MB > > would return: > nodes (flag=0): 2 4 5 (any) > nodes (flag=1): 2 4 5 (mem) > nodes (flag=2): 2 (cpus) > nodes (flag=3): 2 (mem and cpus) > > Tested with: > numactl-devel-0.9.8-7.el5 > numactl-devel-2.0.3-9.el6 > numactl-devel-2.0.7-6.el7 > > numa_node_to_cpus() is broken in older libnuma < 1, so cpumap > is used instead. > > Next step (not part of this series) is to move it outside > syscalls area, so it can be used by other testcases. > > Jan Stancek (2): > numa_helper: add flag to get_allowed_nodes() > update testcases to use flag for get_allowed_nodes() > > .../syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c | 5 +- > testcases/kernel/syscalls/mbind/mbind01.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages02.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages03.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages04.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages05.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages06.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages07.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages08.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages09.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages10.c | 5 +- > .../kernel/syscalls/move_pages/move_pages11.c | 5 +- > .../syscalls/move_pages/move_pages_support.c | 8 +- > testcases/kernel/syscalls/numa/lib/numa_helper.c | 211 +++++++++++++++----- > testcases/kernel/syscalls/numa/lib/numa_helper.h | 8 +- > 15 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) > > Thanks Jan for your patches! I want to test the patchset on all arches and on major releases, so would you mind if I hold on pushing until I finish the testing next week? Also during that period, any comments from anyone is welcomed. Thanks, Caspar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list