From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T6efQ-0001Fe-7e for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:34:32 +0000 Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1T6efP-0003Vy-B3 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:34:32 +0000 Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so746150pbc.34 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503DE20A.8010200@casparzhang.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:34:02 +0800 From: Caspar Zhang MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [LTP] hugemmap02/03? List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: LTP List I looked into hugemmap02 and hugemmap03, they were about huge maping in high region/low region. After checked the codes, I don't think they're well-implmented, or even worse, I don't think the tests make too much sense. I don't know mmap regions very well, is there any other comments against these two cases? Caspar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list