From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T834z-0007eh-2U for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 05:50:41 +0000 Received: from intranet.asianux.com ([58.214.24.6]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1T834w-0003hR-4t for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 05:50:41 +0000 Received: from [10.1.0.143] (unknown [219.143.36.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by intranet.asianux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AC3184029F for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 13:50:30 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <5042F3ED.6030409@asianux.com> Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:51:41 +0800 From: gchen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [LTP] [QUESTION] LTP stress test for RHEL5 and NFS local mount List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5375836535168544385==" Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============5375836535168544385== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080902010401080709030800" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080902010401080709030800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Question: Use ltp stress test (/opt/ltp/ltpstress.sh) with ltp-full-20100331.gz to test RHEL5 (kernel-2.6.18-308.4.1.el5) for 72 hours. Not give any more configurations for NFS (using default configuration: mount NFS locally, so the NFS client and NFS server are on the same machine). My question is that "for stress test, is it suitable to let NFS server and client on the same machine ?" Background; This configuration will cause deadlock for RHEL5, and can not boot machine in normal way. someone from Red Hat has said that: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Have configuration where the same host is acting as both NFS client and server. That's a configuration known to cause deadlocks." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- can reference Red Hat Bugzilla (bug 848706) for more details. thanks. gchen. Asianux Corporation. --------------080902010401080709030800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 
Hello ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net


Question:

Use ltp stress test (/opt/ltp/ltpstress.sh) with ltp-full-20100331.gz
to test RHEL5 (kernel-2.6.18-308.4.1.el5) for 72 hours.

Not give any more configurations for NFS (using default configuration:
mount NFS locally, so the NFS client and NFS server are on the same
machine).

My question is that "for stress test, is it suitable to let NFS server and
client on the same machine ?"


Background;

This configuration will cause deadlock for RHEL5, and can not boot
machine in normal way.

someone from Red Hat has said that:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Have configuration where the same host is acting as both NFS client
and server. That's a configuration known to cause deadlocks."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

can reference Red Hat Bugzilla (bug 848706) for more details.




thanks.

gchen.

Asianux Corporation.
--------------080902010401080709030800-- --===============5375836535168544385== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ --===============5375836535168544385== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list --===============5375836535168544385==--