From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: LTP List <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:58:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5149883A.1060806@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1363664213.git.zliu@redhat.com>
On 03/19/2013 11:40 AM, Zhouping Liu wrote:
> changed log from v1 to v2:
> 1. added a new is_numa() function instead of ISNUMA global variable;
> 2. added new patch to remove the prefix underscroe '_' of the
> internal function name;
> 3. used SAFE_FILE_SCANF() instead of read_file().
> 4. some cleanup...
>
> changed log from v2 to v3:
> 1. as Jan's suggestion, pass 'nodes=NULL' to get_allowed_nodes_arr()
> in is_numa(), and free 'nodes' variable when it passed a non-NULL
> value inside testoom().
>
> changed log from v3 to v4:
> 1. fixed some patch style error
Sorry, I mean ACK V4.
Acked-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> The patch set updated all OOM testcases, and added a new testcase.
>
> Inside old version, OOM only test MPOL_MBIND mempolicy in NUMA
> system, and the combination of CPUSET, MEMCG & NUMA is complex,
> and not clear. Also CPUSET is only used in NUMA system.
>
> These patch set adjust them, now we can coverage the below tests:
> 1) OOM under normal - oom01
> 2) OOM under all mempolicy - oom02
> 3) OOM under MEMCG (+ mempolicy) - oom03
> 4) OOM under CPUSET (+ mempolicy) - oom04
> 5) OOM under CPUSET & MEMCG - oom05
>
> Zhouping Liu (7):
> lib/mem: modified _gather_cpus() as _gather_node_cpus()
> mm/oom02: modified 'OOM for NUMA' as 'OOM for mempolicy'
> numa_helper: added a new function is_numa()
> mm/oom0[3|4]: added 'OOM for CPUSET' and moved 'OOM with MEMCG &
> numa' to oom03
> lib/mem: updated testoom() and oom() funcs
> mm/oom05: new testcase
> lib/mem: removed the prefix underscore '_' of the internal function
> name
>
> runtest/mm | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/include/numa_helper.h | 1 +
> testcases/kernel/lib/numa_helper.c | 24 ++++++
> testcases/kernel/mem/include/mem.h | 4 +-
> testcases/kernel/mem/lib/mem.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom01.c | 6 +-
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom02.c | 20 +++--
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom03.c | 23 +++++-
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom04.c | 60 ++++++--------
> testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/mem/oom/oom05.c
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 3:40 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/7] lib/mem: modified _gather_cpus() as _gather_node_cpus() Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/7] mm/oom02: modified 'OOM for NUMA' as 'OOM for mempolicy' Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 3/7] numa_helper: added a new function is_numa() Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 4/7] mm/oom0[3|4]: added 'OOM for CPUSET' and moved 'OOM with MEMCG & numa' to oom03 Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 5/7] lib/mem: updated testoom() and oom() funcs Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 6/7] mm/oom05: new testcase Zhouping Liu
2013-03-19 3:40 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 7/7] lib/mem: removed the prefix underscore '_' of the internal function name Zhouping Liu
2013-03-20 9:58 ` Wanlong Gao [this message]
2013-03-20 10:25 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/7] mm/oom: extend the coverage of OOM Caspar Zhang
2013-03-21 0:52 ` Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5149883A.1060806@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zliu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox