From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] ustat: Fix EFAULT in 32bit compatability mode
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 07:16:55 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <532035050.101837579.1549541815701.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190207101835.641-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com>
----- Original Message -----
> This test fails with -m32 on Intel because the user land dev_num is too
> large.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> ---
>
> From looking at glibc, this test may also be broken on mips, but I am not
> sure
> if that matters. AFAICT on all other platforms glibc always casts to uint
> after performing a sanity check..
LGTM, LTP is using only 0 (and -1 for errno tests), so it shouldn't matter.
What about ustat02? Are you planning on sending something similar for that test?
Regards,
Jan
>
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c
> index 3f1186c49..2e7dcc9d7 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ustat/ustat01.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ void run(void)
> {
> struct ustat ubuf;
>
> - TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_ustat, dev_num, &ubuf));
> + TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_ustat, (unsigned int)dev_num, &ubuf));
>
> if (TST_RET == -1)
> tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "ustat(2) failed");
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-07 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-02 0:17 [LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/ustat: convert to new lib, use direct syscall Steve Muckle
2019-02-04 12:55 ` Petr Vorel
2019-02-07 10:18 ` [LTP] [PATCH] ustat: Fix EFAULT in 32bit compatability mode Richard Palethorpe
2019-02-07 12:16 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2019-02-07 13:07 ` Petr Vorel
2019-02-07 14:38 ` Richard Palethorpe
2019-02-07 12:52 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=532035050.101837579.1549541815701.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox