From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WkrvA-0002Vn-F4 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 May 2014 09:25:48 +0000 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Wkrv8-0005vc-FN for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 May 2014 09:25:48 +0000 Message-ID: <53748770.8090806@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 17:22:56 +0800 From: Xiaoguang Wang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1400059055-22877-1-git-send-email-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <948116490.5076233.1400060143816.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <948116490.5076233.1400060143816.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH RFC] change MAKE_TARGETS's dependency to normal prerequisites and order-only prerequisites List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jan Stancek Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net Hi, On 05/14/2014 05:35 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Xiaoguang Wang" >> To: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net >> Sent: Wednesday, 14 May, 2014 11:17:35 AM >> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH RFC] change MAKE_TARGETS's dependency to normal prerequisites and order-only prerequisites >> >> See the below issue: >> When we made modifications to source files in lib/, for example >> lib/tst_mkfs.c, then >> back to testcases/kernel/syscalls/access and execute 'make'. This will not >> make the >> access[0-5] to be re-linked with the newly generated libltp.a, we need to >> touch >> access[0-5].c or remove access[0-5] files first, then make. This will make >> no sense. >> Users may expect just a make command to ensure a new access[0-5] generated >> with the >> new libltp.a. >> >> This is because in 'include/mk/generic_leaf_target.inc', MAKE_TARGETS's >> dependency is >> order-only prerequisites, not normal prerequisites, so we change lib's >> dependency type >> to normal prerequisites, not order-only prerequisites. >> >> The original MAKE_DEPS is replaced by MAKE_NORMAL_DEPS or >> MAKE_ORDER_ONLY_DEPS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang >> --- >> include/mk/generic_leaf_target.inc | 2 +- >> include/mk/generic_trunk_target.inc | 2 +- >> include/mk/testcases.mk | 3 ++- >> testcases/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/containers/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/containers/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/controllers/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/controllers/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/include/lib.mk | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/mem/hugetlb/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/mem/include/libmem.mk | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/power_management/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/msgctl/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/syscalls/kill/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/kernel/syscalls/mremap/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/network/rpc/basic_tests/rpc01/Makefile | 2 +- >> testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/Makefile.inc | 2 +- >> testcases/network/tcp_cmds/Makefile.inc | 4 ++-- >> 23 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> > >> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/include/lib.mk >> b/testcases/kernel/include/lib.mk >> index c193ca3..c0b9189 100644 >> --- a/testcases/kernel/include/lib.mk >> +++ b/testcases/kernel/include/lib.mk >> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ $(LIBKERNTEST_DIR): >> $(LIBKERNTEST): $(LIBKERNTEST_DIR) >> $(MAKE) -C $^ -f "$(LIBKERNTEST_SRCDIR)/Makefile" all >> >> -MAKE_DEPS += $(LIBKERNTEST) >> +MAKE_ORDER_ONLY_DEPS += $(LIBKERNTEST) > Hi, > > Why is libkerntest.a order only dependency here? > If we go this way, shouldn't we do it for all libraries? Agree, thanks. I will send a new version later :-) Regards, Xiaoguang Wang > > Regards, > Jan > . > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list