From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:14:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Test for memfd_create() syscall
 withMFD_HUGETLBflag.
In-Reply-To: <4504bc463448837a2489d78d43a19f49.squirrel@pike.zilogic.com>
References: <20180727135320.6590-1-vishnu@zilogic.com>
 <1256447007.36783029.1532959840507.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <4504bc463448837a2489d78d43a19f49.squirrel@pike.zilogic.com>
Message-ID: <554879696.37043235.1533032069506.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it


----- Original Message -----
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your code review. We will make the changes in next patch.
> 
> In set-up(), we are using SAFE_FILE_LINES_SCANF(). Do we need to go
> for FILE_LINES_SCANF() with tst_brk-> TCONF on error?

I don't have strong opinion either way. You can do that - the only
way I see it failing now is if /proc was not mounted, which seems unlikely.

Regards,
Jan

> 
> Regards,
> Vishnu K
> 
>