[LTP] Issue with the reporting of failed tests

[Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>]

On 21/04/2016 19:02, Mason wrote:
> On 21/04/2016 17:42, Mason wrote:
>> On 21/04/2016 17:30, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>> Calling fflush does appear to solve the problem:
>>>>
>>>> # grep -c FAIL result-log.5160
>>>> 38
>>>>
>>>> # wc -l result-failed.5160
>>>> 38 result-failed.5160
>>>>
>>>> Does this mean no one ever reads FAILCMDFILE?!
>>>
>>> Just to have complete image here. I've discussed this a bit more at #ltp
>>> irc channel and the reason why we do not see this bug often is that the
>>> exec() that is done by the child after pan forks must fail (for example
>>> since bash is missing) then the code proceeds to exit(errno) line which
>>> flushes the buffers on open files...
>>
>> Note: in my latest LTP run, I disabled memory overcommit, and pan
>> failed to launch several tests:
>>
>> pan(5163): fork failed (tag proc01).  errno:12  Cannot allocate memory
>> pan(5163): fork failed (tag fs_racer).  errno:12  Cannot allocate memory
>> pan(5163): fork failed (tag quota_remount_test01).  errno:12  Cannot allocate memory
>> pan(5163): fork failed (tag isofs).  errno:12  Cannot allocate memory
>> pan(5163): fork failed (tag fs_perms01).  errno:12  Cannot allocate memory
>> [747 similar lines]
>>
>> /tmp is a ramfs. Maybe something fills it up...
> 
> With overcommit enabled, all tests complete, but some problems remain:
> 
> $ grep -c FAIL result-log.24583 
> 85
> 
> $ wc -l result-failed.24583
> 157 result-failed.24583
> 
> $ sort result-failed.24583 | uniq | wc -l
> 83
> 
> I'm confused as to what else is causing this...

Maybe metan was right, and we must also flush tconfcmdfile?
Will test next week.

Regards.