From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shuang Qiu <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:20:32 +0800
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/removexattr02:skip the test if no xattr
 support
In-Reply-To: <1959236773.1678649.1466772016581.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
References: <1466739362-5914-1-git-send-email-shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
 <1959236773.1678649.1466772016581.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <576D33A0.7090607@oracle.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

On 06/24/2016 08:40 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "shuang qiu" <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
>> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
>> Sent: Friday, 24 June, 2016 5:36:02 AM
>> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/removexattr02:skip the test if no xattr	support
>>
>> From: Shuang Qiu <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
>>
>> Return TCONF if there is no xattr support in fs or mount without user_xattr
>> option
> Why only in removexattr02? Should we do the same for removexattr01?
removexattr01 already handle such situation.

Thanks
Shuang
>
> Regards,
> Jan