From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UhdsC-0006TW-N1 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:44:52 +0000 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UhdsB-0005Ee-Az for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:44:52 +0000 Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:44:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Jan Stancek Message-ID: <577470418.347391.1369824283490.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51A5D7A9.3070801@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <51A5C347.4020202@cn.fujitsu.com> <1098836685.51729.1369819107988.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <51A5D7A9.3070801@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: DAN LI Cc: LTP list ----- Original Message ----- > From: "DAN LI" > To: "Jan Stancek" > Cc: "LTP list" > Sent: Wednesday, 29 May, 2013 12:25:45 PM > Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg > > On 05/29/2013 05:18 PM, Jan Stancek wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "DAN LI" > >> To: "LTP list" > >> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May, 2013 10:58:47 AM > >> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] shmget/shmget01.c: cleanup and attach SHM_NORESERVE > >> to shmflg > >> > >> > >> 1. Remove useless comments > >> > >> 2. Revise code to follow ltp-code-style > >> > >> 3. Add SHM_NORESERVE to shmflg to test > > > > Can you add some description why you are adding this flag? > > Actually, we are trying to complete test cases and expand > the test scope of LTP. > > So, it is just for completeness of this case. My concern here is: So if we add this flag, we cover SHM_NORESERVE path. Do we have a testcase which still covers current non-SHM_NORESERVE path? Regards, Jan > > Regards, > DAN LI > > > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: DAN LI > >> --- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list