From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: DAN LI <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LTP list <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:11:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <579338756.5630570.1369206681507.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519C24C9.9070807@cn.fujitsu.com>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "DAN LI" <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
> To: "LTP list" <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Cc: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 May, 2013 3:52:09 AM
> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter
>
>
> For SEM_STAT, the semid argument is not a semaphore identifier, but instead
> an
> index into the kernel’s internal array that maintains information about all
> semaphore sets on the system.
>
> Pass a correct index of the kernel' internal array intead of a semaphores id
> when
> testing feature SEM_STAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: DAN LI <li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com>
Looks good to me. sem_index == 0 would work too, I'm assuming you
went with hidx as a corner case, which is also valid value.
Reviewed-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Regards,
Jan
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c | 37
> ++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> index 687d909..0399842 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl/semctl01.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ char *TCID = "semctl01";
> int TST_TOTAL = 13;
>
> static int sem_id_1 = -1;
> +static int sem_index;
>
> static int sync_pipes[2];
>
> @@ -100,25 +101,26 @@ static int sem_op;
> #endif
>
> static struct test_case_t {
> + int *semid;
> int semnum;
> int cmd;
> void (*func_test) ();
> union semun arg;
> void (*func_setup) ();
> } TC[] = {
> - {0, IPC_STAT, func_stat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_SET, func_set, SEMUN_CAST & buf, set_setup},
> - {0, GETALL, func_gall, SEMUN_CAST array, NULL},
> - {SEM4, GETNCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> - {SEM2, GETPID, func_pid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, pid_setup},
> - {SEM2, GETVAL, func_gval, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {SEM4, GETZCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> - {0, SETALL, func_sall, SEMUN_CAST array, sall_setup},
> - {SEM4, SETVAL, func_sval, SEMUN_CAST INCVAL, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_INFO, func_iinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> - {0, SEM_INFO, func_sinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> - {0, SEM_STAT, func_sstat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> - {0, IPC_RMID, func_rmid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_STAT, func_stat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_SET, func_set, SEMUN_CAST & buf, set_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, GETALL, func_gall, SEMUN_CAST array, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, GETNCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM2, GETPID, func_pid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, pid_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM2, GETVAL, func_gval, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, GETZCNT, func_cnt, SEMUN_CAST & buf, cnt_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, SETALL, func_sall, SEMUN_CAST array, sall_setup},
> + {&sem_id_1, SEM4, SETVAL, func_sval, SEMUN_CAST INCVAL, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_INFO, func_iinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, SEM_INFO, func_sinfo, SEMUN_CAST & ipc_buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_index, 0, SEM_STAT, func_sstat, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> + {&sem_id_1, 0, IPC_RMID, func_rmid, SEMUN_CAST & buf, NULL},
> };
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> @@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> }
>
> - TEST(semctl(sem_id_1, TC[i].semnum, TC[i].cmd,
> + TEST(semctl(*(TC[i].semid), TC[i].semnum, TC[i].cmd,
> TC[i].arg));
>
> if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> @@ -560,10 +562,13 @@ static void func_rmid(void)
>
> static void func_iinfo(int hidx)
> {
> - if (hidx >= 0)
> + if (hidx >= 0) {
> + sem_index = hidx;
> tst_resm(TPASS, "the highest index is correct");
> - else
> + } else {
> + sem_index = 0;
> tst_resm(TFAIL, "the highest index is incorrect");
> + }
> }
>
> static void func_sinfo(void)
> --
> 1.8.1
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 1:52 [LTP] [PATCH V2] semctl01.c: Pass the correct parameter DAN LI
2013-05-22 7:11 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2013-05-22 8:56 ` Wanlong Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=579338756.5630570.1369206681507.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=li.dan@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox