public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH] memcg_process: cleanup the SHM segment
@ 2016-09-02 12:24 Stanislav Kholmanskikh
  2016-09-06 16:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh @ 2016-09-02 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Let's mark the segment for removal right after we attach it.
This way memcg* test cases will no longer leave unused
segments after they finish.

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
---
 .../controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c   |    9 ++++-----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
index fbb76e2..e2c60de 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
@@ -234,9 +234,6 @@ static void shm(void)
 		if (key == -1)
 			err(1, "ftok() failed");
 
-		shmid = shmget(key, memsize, flag);
-		if (shmid == -1)
-			err(1, "shmget() failed");
 		shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
 
 		shmid = shmget(key, memsize, flag);
@@ -248,12 +245,14 @@ static void shm(void)
 			shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
 			err(1, "shmat() failed");
 		}
+
+		if (shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL) == -1)
+			err(1, "shmctl() failed");
+
 		touch_memory(p, memsize);
 	} else {
 		if (shmdt(p) == -1)
 			err(1, "shmdt() failed");
-		if (shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL) == -1)
-			err(1, "shmctl() failed");
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] memcg_process: cleanup the SHM segment
  2016-09-02 12:24 [LTP] [PATCH] memcg_process: cleanup the SHM segment Stanislav Kholmanskikh
@ 2016-09-06 16:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
  2016-09-08  9:39   ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2016-09-06 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi!
> Let's mark the segment for removal right after we attach it.
> This way memcg* test cases will no longer leave unused
> segments after they finish.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
> ---
>  .../controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c   |    9 ++++-----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
> index fbb76e2..e2c60de 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
> @@ -234,9 +234,6 @@ static void shm(void)
>  		if (key == -1)
>  			err(1, "ftok() failed");
>  
> -		shmid = shmget(key, memsize, flag);
> -		if (shmid == -1)
> -			err(1, "shmget() failed");
>  		shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
                     ^
Shouldn't we remove this IPC_RMID as well?


Otherwise it looks fine.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] memcg_process: cleanup the SHM segment
  2016-09-06 16:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2016-09-08  9:39   ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh @ 2016-09-08  9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi

On 09/06/2016 07:01 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> Let's mark the segment for removal right after we attach it.
>> This way memcg* test cases will no longer leave unused
>> segments after they finish.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  .../controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c   |    9 ++++-----
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
>> index fbb76e2..e2c60de 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/functional/memcg_process.c
>> @@ -234,9 +234,6 @@ static void shm(void)
>>  		if (key == -1)
>>  			err(1, "ftok() failed");
>>  
>> -		shmid = shmget(key, memsize, flag);
>> -		if (shmid == -1)
>> -			err(1, "shmget() failed");
>>  		shmctl(shmid, IPC_RMID, NULL);
>                      ^
> Shouldn't we remove this IPC_RMID as well?
> 

Agreed. It's better to remove it.

> 
> Otherwise it looks fine.
> 

Pushed with the removal of the above IPC_RMID call.

Thank you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-08  9:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-02 12:24 [LTP] [PATCH] memcg_process: cleanup the SHM segment Stanislav Kholmanskikh
2016-09-06 16:01 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-09-08  9:39   ` Stanislav Kholmanskikh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox