public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guangwen Feng <fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/signal06: fix test for regression with earlier version of gcc and kernel
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 18:31:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57F627EF.7070605@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161005134303.GA23476@rei.lan>

Hi!

Thanks for your comments!

On 10/05/2016 09:43 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> First of all sorry for the delay.
> 
>> 1. Currently, following code is incorrect on some releases with
>>    earlier version of gcc(tested on RHEL5.11GA):
>>
>> 	while (D == d && loop < LOOPS) {
>>
>>    Because the argument in function test(double d) is used via (%rsp),
>>    but here we actually need a xmm register to trigger the fpu bug.
>>    So use global value instead to make sure to take use of xmm.
> 
> This looks OK.
> 
>> 2. Although this regression test is designed to trigger SIGSEGV
>>    intentionally, on some releases with old kernel(tested on RHEL5.11GA),
>>    this will still lead to segmentation fault that terminate the program
>>    and break the test even though compiling with -O2.  So slightly adjust
>>    the weight of the codes in child thread to depress SIGSEGV trigger's
>>    chance while increase LOOPS to ensure reproducible.
> 
> Hmm, what is the exact problem here? Does the old kernel break if we
> send the signal too fast?

Yes, running signal06 reports segmentation fault and breaks the test
if we send the signal too fast on the old kernel.

> 
> I do not like much that the test takes ten times more time to finish
> now.

Yes, it will take ten times more time than before, but it only takes
3~4 seconds to finish...

By current LOOPS(10000), most of the time, the buggy kernel can be
reproduced, but there is still a chance(about 0.5% in my environment)
to miss.


Best Regards,
Guangwen Feng



  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-06 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-05  6:58 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/signal06: fix test for regression with earlier version of gcc and kernel Guangwen Feng
2016-08-08  8:44 ` Li Wang
2016-08-16  3:08   ` Guangwen Feng
2016-09-20  9:59 ` Guangwen Feng
2016-10-05 13:43 ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-10-06 10:31   ` Guangwen Feng [this message]
2016-10-06 11:15     ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-10-10  7:05       ` Guangwen Feng
2016-10-10 13:15         ` Cyril Hrubis
2016-10-11  7:17           ` Guangwen Feng
2016-11-16  8:14           ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Guangwen Feng
2017-02-09  9:00             ` Guangwen Feng
2017-02-09 16:19             ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-13  3:38               ` Guangwen Feng
2017-02-13  9:12                 ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57F627EF.7070605@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox