From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 18:39:14 +0800
Subject: [LTP] Question about the usage of tst_brk()
In-Reply-To: <5BE2BF88.3090902@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <5BE2BF88.3090902@cn.fujitsu.com>
Message-ID: <5BE2C0D2.6090602@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

Hi,

If only TFAIL, TBROK and TCONF should be supported by tst_brk() in new library,
i will add check to mark TWARN and TPASS as invalid.

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang

On 2018/11/07 18:33, Xiao Yang wrote:
> Hi Jan, Cyril
>
>  From old library(i.e. test.h), it seems that only TFAIL, TBROK and TCONF
> are supported by tst_brkm().
>
>  From new library, are only TFAIL, TBROK and TCONF are supported by
> tst_brk() as well?
> I am not sure if tst_brk()should support TWARN.
>
> Best Regards,
> Xiao Yang
>
>
>