From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Yang Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:04:57 +0800 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] runtest/syscalls: add set_mempolicy* In-Reply-To: <20190829203826.GA5711@dell5510> References: <1566987255-3010-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190829203826.GA5711@dell5510> Message-ID: <5D688449.3080906@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it On 2019/08/30 4:38, Petr Vorel wrote: > Hi, > >> Since commit 55ee8a5ad ("syscalls: Add set_mempolicy numa tests"), >> these cases have been added into runtests/numa, but forget to add it >> in runtest/syscalls. >> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel >> --- >> runtest/syscalls | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls >> index c41ba2a0d..1694ef147 100644 >> --- a/runtest/syscalls >> +++ b/runtest/syscalls >> @@ -1177,6 +1177,11 @@ setitimer01 setitimer01 >> setitimer02 setitimer02 >> setitimer03 setitimer03 >> +set_mempolicy01 set_mempolicy01 >> +set_mempolicy02 set_mempolicy02 >> +set_mempolicy03 set_mempolicy03 >> +set_mempolicy04 set_mempolicy04 >> + >> setns01 setns01 >> setns02 setns02 > Wouldn't be better to move all NUMA tests out of syscalls? > Syscalls are big already. Hi Petr, all NUMA tests actually verify the functionality of syscalls(move_pages(2), set_mempolicy(2), etc) so I think that they can be added into syscalls group. PS: If someone want to run syscalls from LTP as many as possible, they just need to run syscalls group directly. Best Regards, Xiao Yang > BTW I'm looking forward to the new testrunner [1][2], which also solve problem > of runtest files :) > > Kind regards, > Petr > > [1] https://people.kernel.org/metan/towards-parallel-kernel-test-runs > [2] https://github.com/metan-ucw/ltp/tree/master/docparse > > > . >