[LTP] [PATCH 1/2] runtest/syscalls: add set_mempolicy*

[Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>]

on 2019/08/30 10:04, Xiao Yang wrote:

> On 2019/08/30 4:38, Petr Vorel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> Since commit 55ee8a5ad ("syscalls: Add set_mempolicy numa tests"),
>>> these cases have been added into runtests/numa, but forget to add it
>>> in runtest/syscalls.
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel<pvorel@suse.cz>
>>> ---
>>>    runtest/syscalls | 5 +++++
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>> diff --git a/runtest/syscalls b/runtest/syscalls
>>> index c41ba2a0d..1694ef147 100644
>>> --- a/runtest/syscalls
>>> +++ b/runtest/syscalls
>>> @@ -1177,6 +1177,11 @@ setitimer01 setitimer01
>>>    setitimer02 setitimer02
>>>    setitimer03 setitimer03
>>> +set_mempolicy01 set_mempolicy01
>>> +set_mempolicy02 set_mempolicy02
>>> +set_mempolicy03 set_mempolicy03
>>> +set_mempolicy04 set_mempolicy04
>>> +
>>>    setns01 setns01
>>>    setns02 setns02
>> Wouldn't be better to move all NUMA tests out of syscalls?
>> Syscalls are big already.
> Hi Petr,
> all NUMA tests actually verify the functionality of
> syscalls(move_pages(2), set_mempolicy(2), etc)
> so I think that they can be added into syscalls group.
> PS: If someone want to run syscalls from LTP as many as possible, they
> just need to run syscalls group directly.
+1 , set_mempolicy syscall should belong to numa and syscall group.

> Best Regards,
> Xiao Yang
>> BTW I'm looking forward to the new testrunner [1][2], which also solve problem
>> of runtest files :)
Hi Petr

For new testrunner,  I think it is a good improvement to save test time by parallel running case.
I am also looking forward to it.

>> Kind regards,
>> Petr
>> [1] https://people.kernel.org/metan/towards-parallel-kernel-test-runs
>> [2] https://github.com/metan-ucw/ltp/tree/master/docparse
>> .
> .