* [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for kconfig constraints
@ 2020-11-03 16:10 Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval Cyril Hrubis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-11-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
This patchset adds a support for generic boolean expressions in order to
be able to check for a more complex kernel configurations.
The motivation for this is recent rename in kernel config names that
cannot be checked for by a simplistic approach we previously
implemented.
The boolean expression parser was written as a generic as possible since
I do expect that we will reuse it for different types of assertions in
the future.
Cyril Hrubis (2):
lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval
lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt | 21 +-
include/tst_bool_expr.h | 85 +++++
include/tst_kconfig.h | 34 +-
lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore | 2 +
lib/newlib_tests/config06 | 1 +
lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c | 2 +
lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c | 23 ++
lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c | 128 ++++++++
lib/tst_bool_expr.c | 398 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/tst_kconfig.c | 366 ++++++++++++++--------
testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 14 +-
11 files changed, 919 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/tst_bool_expr.h
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/config06
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c
create mode 100644 lib/tst_bool_expr.c
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval
2020-11-03 16:10 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for kconfig constraints Cyril Hrubis
@ 2020-11-03 16:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-04 13:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
2020-11-06 8:10 ` Xiao Yang
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval Cyril Hrubis
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-11-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Add a simple and generic boolean expression parser and evaluator. This
is a first step in order to implement more complex kconfig expressions,
but since we are likely to reuse the parser for other purposes in the
future it's implemented as a generic boolean parser.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
---
v4:
- struct tst_expr is now trailing array
- pointer in tst_expr renamed from expr to rpn
- pass just pointer to the array to the tokenize() function
include/tst_bool_expr.h | 85 +++++++
lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore | 1 +
lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c | 128 ++++++++++
lib/tst_bool_expr.c | 398 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 612 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/tst_bool_expr.h
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c
create mode 100644 lib/tst_bool_expr.c
diff --git a/include/tst_bool_expr.h b/include/tst_bool_expr.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..894d21954
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/tst_bool_expr.h
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+#ifndef TST_BOOL_EXPR_H__
+#define TST_BOOL_EXPR_H__
+
+enum tst_op {
+ TST_OP_NOT,
+ TST_OP_AND,
+ TST_OP_OR,
+ TST_OP_VAR,
+ /* Used only internally */
+ TST_OP_LPAR,
+ TST_OP_RPAR,
+};
+
+struct tst_expr_tok {
+ enum tst_op op;
+ const char *tok;
+ size_t tok_len;
+ struct tst_expr_tok *next;
+ const void *priv;
+};
+
+struct tst_expr {
+ struct tst_expr_tok *rpn;
+ struct tst_expr_tok buf[];
+};
+
+/*
+ * Parses an boolean expression and returns a simplified RPN version.
+ *
+ * If expression is not valid the call prints error into stderr and returns
+ * NULL. On success pointer to an expression is returned which can be evaluated
+ * by the tst_bool_expr_eval() function and has to be later freed by the
+ * caller.
+ *
+ * The boolean expression can consists of:
+ *
+ * - unary negation opeartion !
+ * - two binary operations & and |
+ * - correct sequence of parentheses ()
+ * - strings that are treated as boolean variables
+ *
+ * e.g. '(A | B) & C' or 'Variable_1 & Variable_2' are both a valid boolean
+ * expressions.
+ *
+ * @expr String containing a boolean expression to be parsed.
+ * @return Pointer to an RPN expression.
+ */
+struct tst_expr *tst_bool_expr_parse(const char *expr);
+
+/*
+ * Prints an string representation of the expression into a FILE.
+ *
+ * @param A FILE to print to.
+ * @expr An expression to print.
+ */
+void tst_bool_expr_print(FILE *f, struct tst_expr *expr);
+
+/*
+ * Evaluates an expression given a map for variables.
+ *
+ * The call will fail if:
+ * - map function returns -1 which indicates undefined variable
+ * - the eval function runs out of stack
+ *
+ * @param expr Boolean expression in RPN.
+ * @param map Mapping function for boolean variables.
+ *
+ * @return Returns 0 or 1 if expression was evaluated correctly and -1 on error.
+ */
+int tst_bool_expr_eval(struct tst_expr *expr,
+ int (*map)(struct tst_expr_tok *var));
+
+/*
+ * Frees the memory allocated by the tst_bool_expr_parse().
+ *
+ * @param Boolean expression.
+ */
+void tst_bool_expr_free(struct tst_expr *expr);
+
+#endif /* TST_BOOL_EXPR_H__ */
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
index 44bc6526f..1e96db1da 100644
--- a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
@@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ test_exec_child
test_kconfig
variant
test_guarded_buf
+tst_bool_expr
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f9bb1780d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/tst_bool_expr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Basic unit test for the bolean expression parser and evaluator.
+ */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "tst_bool_expr.h"
+
+static int a, b, c;
+
+static int map(struct tst_expr_tok *var)
+{
+ if (!strncmp(var->tok, "A", var->tok_len))
+ return a;
+
+ if (!strncmp(var->tok, "B", var->tok_len))
+ return b;
+
+ if (!strncmp(var->tok, "C", var->tok_len))
+ return c;
+
+ if (!strncmp(var->tok, "True", var->tok_len))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (!strncmp(var->tok, "False", var->tok_len))
+ return 0;
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void parse_fail(const char *expr)
+{
+ struct tst_expr *res;
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Parsing '%s'", expr);
+
+ res = tst_bool_expr_parse(expr);
+
+ if (res) {
+ printf("In RPN: ");
+ tst_bool_expr_print(stdout, res);
+ printf("\n");
+ tst_bool_expr_free(res);
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Expression was parsed");
+ } else {
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Parser returned an error");
+ }
+}
+
+static void do_eval_test(const char *expr_str, int set_a, int set_b, int set_c, int exp_res)
+{
+ struct tst_expr *expr;
+ int res;
+
+ a = set_a;
+ b = set_b;
+ c = set_c;
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "'%s' A=%i B=%i C=%i == %i", expr_str, a, b, c, exp_res);
+
+ expr = tst_bool_expr_parse(expr_str);
+
+ if (!expr) {
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Parser returned error");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ printf("In RPN: ");
+ tst_bool_expr_print(stdout, expr);
+ printf("\n");
+
+ res = tst_bool_expr_eval(expr, map);
+
+ if (res == exp_res)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Got %i", res);
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Got %i", res);
+
+ tst_bool_expr_free(expr);
+}
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ do_eval_test("(A | B) & !!C", 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("(A | B) & !!C", 1, 0, 1, 1);
+ do_eval_test("!A & B", 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("!A & B", 0, 1, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test("A & !B", 1, 0, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test("!!A & !!B", 0, 1, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("!!A & !!B", 1, 1, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test("!(A & B) & C", 1, 1, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("A & (B | C)", 1, 1, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test("A & B | C", 1, 1, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test("((((A)))&(B))", 1, 1, 0, 1);
+ do_eval_test(" A \t", 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("False & A", 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ do_eval_test("! Undefined", 0, 0, 0, -1);
+
+ parse_fail("A!");
+ parse_fail("A &");
+ parse_fail("A B");
+ parse_fail("A ) B");
+ parse_fail("A ( B");
+ parse_fail("A ( B )");
+ parse_fail("A |");
+ parse_fail("A ! B");
+ parse_fail("A! & B");
+ parse_fail("A & | B");
+ parse_fail("A & (B |)");
+ parse_fail("A & ( | B)");
+ parse_fail("A & B &");
+ parse_fail("((A )");
+ parse_fail("& A");
+ parse_fail("! &");
+ parse_fail(")");
+ parse_fail("| A");
+ parse_fail("");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+};
diff --git a/lib/tst_bool_expr.c b/lib/tst_bool_expr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dd147cde3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/tst_bool_expr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,398 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ */
+/*
+ * Boolean expression is evaluated in three steps.
+ *
+ * First of all the string containing the expression is tokenized. The
+ * tokenizer runs twice and we only count number of tokens in the first pass in
+ * order to simplify the memory allocation.
+ *
+ * Secondly the the expression is transformed to a postfix (RPN) notation by
+ * the shunting yard algorithm and the correctness of the expression is checked
+ * during the transformation as well. The fact that parenthesis are matched is
+ * asserted by the shunting yard algorithm itself while the rest is checked
+ * simply by checking if the preceding token is in a set of allowed tokens.
+ * This could be thought of as a simple open-coded state machine.
+ *
+ * An expression in the RPN form can be evaluated given a variable mapping
+ * function. The evaluation ignores most of errors because invalid expression
+ * will be rejected in the second step.
+ */
+
+#include <string.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include "tst_bool_expr.h"
+
+static int char_to_op(char c)
+{
+ switch (c) {
+ case '(':
+ return TST_OP_LPAR;
+ case ')':
+ return TST_OP_RPAR;
+ case '&':
+ return TST_OP_AND;
+ case '|':
+ return TST_OP_OR;
+ case '!':
+ return TST_OP_NOT;
+ default:
+ return TST_OP_VAR;
+ }
+}
+
+static int new_tok(struct tst_expr_tok **last, const char *tok, size_t tok_len)
+{
+ if (!tok_len)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!(*last))
+ return 1;
+
+ (*last)->tok = tok;
+ (*last)->tok_len = tok_len;
+ (*last)->op = char_to_op(tok[0]);
+ (*last)++;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static unsigned int tokenize(const char *expr, struct tst_expr_tok *last)
+{
+ size_t i, j;
+ unsigned int token_cnt = 0;
+
+ for (j = i = 0; expr[i]; i++) {
+ switch (expr[i]) {
+ case '(':
+ case ')':
+ case '!':
+ case '&':
+ case '|':
+ token_cnt += new_tok(&last, &expr[j], i - j);
+ token_cnt += new_tok(&last, &expr[i], 1);
+ j = i+1;
+ break;
+ case '\t':
+ case ' ':
+ token_cnt += new_tok(&last, &expr[j], i - j);
+ j = i+1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ token_cnt += new_tok(&last, &expr[j], i - j);
+
+ return token_cnt;
+}
+
+void tst_bool_expr_print(FILE *f, struct tst_expr *expr)
+{
+ struct tst_expr_tok *i;
+ size_t j;
+
+ for (i = expr->rpn; i; i = i->next) {
+ for (j = 0; j < i->tok_len; j++)
+ putc(i->tok[j], f);
+
+ if (i->next)
+ putc(' ', f);
+ }
+}
+
+static void print_spaces(FILE *f, unsigned int spaces)
+{
+ while (spaces--)
+ putc(' ', f);
+}
+
+static void tst_bool_expr_err(FILE *f, struct tst_expr *expr, unsigned int cnt)
+{
+ unsigned int i, spaces, err_len;
+ const char *err;
+
+ fprintf(f, "%s", expr->buf->tok);
+ fprintf(f, "\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
+ if (expr->buf[i].priv)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ spaces = expr->buf[i].tok - expr->buf[0].tok;
+ err = expr->buf[i].priv;
+ err_len = strlen(err);
+
+ print_spaces(f, spaces);
+
+ fprintf(f, "^\n");
+
+ if (err_len < spaces)
+ print_spaces(f, spaces - err_len + 1);
+
+ fprintf(f, "%s\n", err);
+}
+
+static inline void stack_push(struct tst_expr_tok *stack[], unsigned int *op_stack_pos,
+ struct tst_expr_tok *op)
+{
+ stack[(*op_stack_pos)++] = op;
+}
+
+static inline int stack_empty(unsigned int op_stack_pos)
+{
+ return op_stack_pos == 0;
+}
+
+static inline struct tst_expr_tok *stack_pop(struct tst_expr_tok *stack[],
+ unsigned int *op_stack_pos)
+{
+ if (stack_empty(*op_stack_pos))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return stack[--(*op_stack_pos)];
+}
+
+#define TST_OP_NONE -1
+
+static inline int stack_peek_op(struct tst_expr_tok *stack[],
+ unsigned int op_stack_pos)
+{
+ if (stack_empty(op_stack_pos))
+ return TST_OP_NONE;
+
+ return stack[op_stack_pos - 1]->op;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is a complete list of which tokens can happen before any of:
+ * - variable
+ * - left parentesis
+ * - negation
+ *
+ * The -1 represents start of the expression.
+ */
+static inline int check_one(int op)
+{
+ switch (op) {
+ case TST_OP_AND:
+ case TST_OP_OR:
+ case TST_OP_NOT:
+ case TST_OP_NONE:
+ case TST_OP_LPAR:
+ return 0;
+ default:
+ return 1;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * And this checks for tokens that can happen before any of:
+ * - right parentesis
+ * - and
+ * - or
+ *
+ * This is also used to check that the last token in expression is correct one.
+ */
+static inline int check_two(int op)
+{
+ switch (op) {
+ case TST_OP_VAR:
+ case TST_OP_RPAR:
+ return 1;
+ default:
+ return 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static int shunting_yard(struct tst_expr *expr, unsigned int cnt)
+{
+ struct tst_expr_tok *op_stack[cnt];
+ unsigned int op_stack_pos = 0;
+ struct tst_expr_tok *out[cnt + 1];
+ unsigned int out_pos = 0;
+ struct tst_expr_tok *i;
+ unsigned int j;
+ int prev_op = TST_OP_NONE;
+
+ for (i = expr->buf; i < &(expr->buf[cnt]); i++) {
+ switch (i->op) {
+ case TST_OP_VAR:
+ if (check_one(prev_op)) {
+ i->priv = "Expected operation";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, i);
+
+ while (stack_peek_op(op_stack, op_stack_pos) == TST_OP_NOT)
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, stack_pop(op_stack, &op_stack_pos));
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_LPAR:
+ if (check_one(prev_op)) {
+ i->priv = "Expected operation";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ stack_push(op_stack, &op_stack_pos, i);
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_RPAR:
+ if (!check_two(prev_op)) {
+ i->priv = "Expected variable or )";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* pop everything till ( */
+ for (;;) {
+ struct tst_expr_tok *op = stack_pop(op_stack, &op_stack_pos);
+
+ if (!op) {
+ i->priv = "Missing (";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ if (op->op == TST_OP_LPAR)
+ break;
+
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, op);
+ }
+
+ while (stack_peek_op(op_stack, op_stack_pos) == TST_OP_NOT)
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, stack_pop(op_stack, &op_stack_pos));
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_NOT:
+ if (check_one(prev_op)) {
+ i->priv = "Expected operation";
+ goto err;
+ }
+ stack_push(op_stack, &op_stack_pos, i);
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_AND:
+ case TST_OP_OR:
+ if (!check_two(prev_op)) {
+ i->priv = "Expected variable or (";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * There can be at most one binary op on the stack
+ * since we pop the one present on the stack before we
+ * attempt to push new one they so never accumulate.
+ */
+ switch (stack_peek_op(op_stack, op_stack_pos)) {
+ case TST_OP_AND:
+ case TST_OP_OR:
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, stack_pop(op_stack, &op_stack_pos));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ stack_push(op_stack, &op_stack_pos, i);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ prev_op = i->op;
+ }
+
+ if (!check_two(expr->buf[cnt-1].op)) {
+ expr->buf[cnt-1].priv = "Unfinished expression";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* pop remaining operations */
+ while ((i = stack_pop(op_stack, &op_stack_pos))) {
+ if (i->op == TST_OP_LPAR) {
+ i->priv = "Missing )";
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ stack_push(out, &out_pos, i);
+ }
+
+ /* construct the list */
+ out[out_pos] = NULL;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < out_pos; j++)
+ out[j]->next = out[j + 1];
+
+ expr->rpn = out[0];
+
+ return 0;
+err:
+ return 1;
+}
+
+struct tst_expr *tst_bool_expr_parse(const char *expr)
+{
+ struct tst_expr *ret;
+ unsigned int tok_cnt = tokenize(expr, NULL);
+
+ if (!tok_cnt)
+ return NULL;
+
+ ret = malloc(sizeof(struct tst_expr) + sizeof(struct tst_expr_tok) * tok_cnt);
+ if (!ret)
+ return NULL;
+
+ tokenize(expr, ret->buf);
+
+ if (shunting_yard(ret, tok_cnt)) {
+ tst_bool_expr_err(stderr, ret, tok_cnt);
+ tst_bool_expr_free(ret);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+#define MAX_STACK 16
+
+int tst_bool_expr_eval(struct tst_expr *expr,
+ int (*map)(struct tst_expr_tok *var))
+{
+ struct tst_expr_tok *i;
+ int stack[MAX_STACK];
+ int pos = -1;
+
+ for (i = expr->rpn; i; i = i->next) {
+ switch (i->op) {
+ case TST_OP_NOT:
+ stack[pos] = !stack[pos];
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_OR:
+ stack[pos-1] = stack[pos] || stack[pos-1];
+ pos--;
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_AND:
+ stack[pos-1] = stack[pos] && stack[pos-1];
+ pos--;
+ break;
+ case TST_OP_VAR:
+ if (pos + 1 >= MAX_STACK) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Eval out of stack!\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ stack[++pos] = map(i);
+
+ /* map reported undefined variable -> abort */
+ if (stack[pos] == -1)
+ return -1;
+ break;
+ /* does not happen */
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return stack[0];
+}
+
+void tst_bool_expr_free(struct tst_expr *expr)
+{
+ free(expr);
+}
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-03 16:10 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for kconfig constraints Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval Cyril Hrubis
@ 2020-11-03 16:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-06 8:09 ` Xiao Yang
2020-11-06 10:21 ` Li Wang
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-11-03 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Now each string in the kconfig[] array in tst_test structure is an
boolean expression which is evaluated. All expressions has to be true in
order for the test to continue.
This also makes the parser for the kernel config a bit more robust as it
was pointed out that there may have been cases where it could be mislead
by hand edited config files.
+ Update the docs.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
CC: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
---
doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt | 21 +-
include/tst_kconfig.h | 34 +--
lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore | 1 +
lib/newlib_tests/config06 | 1 +
lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c | 2 +
lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c | 23 ++
lib/tst_kconfig.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++--------
testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c | 14 +-
8 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/config06
create mode 100644 lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c
diff --git a/doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt b/doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt
index 1a51ef7c7..3c2ab7166 100644
--- a/doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt
+++ b/doc/test-writing-guidelines.txt
@@ -1643,21 +1643,26 @@ on the system, disabled syscalls can be detected by checking for 'ENOSYS'
errno etc.
However in rare cases core kernel features couldn't be detected based on the
-kernel userspace API and we have to resort to kernel .config parsing.
+kernel userspace API and we have to resort to parse the kernel .config.
-For this cases the test should set the 'NULL' terminated '.needs_kconfigs' array
-of kernel config options required for the test. The config option can be
-specified either as plain "CONFIG_FOO" in which case it's sufficient for the
-test continue if it's set to any value (typically =y or =m). Or with a value
-as "CONFIG_FOO=bar" in which case the value has to match as well. The test is
-aborted with 'TCONF' if any of the required options were not set.
+For this cases the test should set the 'NULL' terminated '.needs_kconfigs'
+array of boolean expressions with constraints on the kconfig variables. The
+boolean expression consits of variables, two binary operations '&' and '|',
+negation '!' and correct sequence of parentesis '()'. Variables are expected
+to be in a form of "CONFIG_FOO[=bar]".
+
+The test will continue to run if all expressions are evaluated to 'True'.
+Missing variable is mapped to 'False' as well as variable with different than
+specified value, e.g. 'CONFIG_FOO=bar' will evaluate to 'False' if the value
+is anything else but 'bar'. If config variable is specified as plain
+'CONFIG_FOO' it's evaluated to true it's set to any value (typically =y or =m).
[source,c]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#include "tst_test.h"
static const char *kconfigs[] = {
- "CONFIG_X86_INTEL_UMIP",
+ "CONFIG_X86_INTEL_UMIP | CONFIG_X86_UMIP",
NULL
};
diff --git a/include/tst_kconfig.h b/include/tst_kconfig.h
index 2d2cfd782..1bb21fea8 100644
--- a/include/tst_kconfig.h
+++ b/include/tst_kconfig.h
@@ -6,27 +6,27 @@
#ifndef TST_KCONFIG_H__
#define TST_KCONFIG_H__
-struct tst_kconfig_res {
- char match;
- char *value;
+struct tst_kconfig_var {
+ char id[64];
+ unsigned int id_len;
+ char choice;
+ char *val;
};
/**
- * Reads a kernel config and parses it for values defined in kconfigs array.
+ *
+ * Reads a kernel config, parses it and writes results into an array of
+ * tst_kconfig_var structures.
*
* The path to the kernel config should be autodetected in most of the cases as
* the code looks for know locations. It can be explicitely set/overrided with
* the KCONFIG_PATH environment variable as well.
*
- * The kcofings array is expected to contain strings in a format "CONFIG_FOO"
- * or "CONFIG_FOO=bar". The result array has to be suitably sized to fit the
- * results.
- *
- * @param kconfigs array of config strings to look for
- * @param results array to store results to
- * @param cnt size of the arrays
+ * The caller has to initialize the tst_kconfig_var structure. The id has to be
+ * filled with config variable name such as 'CONFIG_FOO', the id_len should
+ * hold the id string length and the choice and val has to be zeroed.
*
- * The match in the tst_kconfig_res structure is set as follows:
+ * After a call to this function each choice be set as follows:
*
* 'm' - config option set to m
* 'y' - config option set to y
@@ -34,11 +34,13 @@ struct tst_kconfig_res {
* 'n' - config option is not set
* 0 - config option not found
*
- * In the case that match is set to 'v' the value points to a newly allocated
- * string that holds the value.
+ * In the case that match is set to 'v' the val pointer points to a newly
+ * allocated string that holds the value.
+ *
+ * @param vars An array of caller initalized tst_kconfig_var structures.
+ * @param vars_len Length of the vars array.
*/
-void tst_kconfig_read(const char *const kconfigs[],
- struct tst_kconfig_res results[], size_t cnt);
+void tst_kconfig_read(struct tst_kconfig_var vars[], size_t vars_len);
/**
* Checks if required kernel configuration options are set in the kernel
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
index 1e96db1da..89de61cf7 100644
--- a/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/.gitignore
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ test_timer
test_exec
test_exec_child
test_kconfig
+test_kconfig01
variant
test_guarded_buf
tst_bool_expr
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/config06 b/lib/newlib_tests/config06
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b7db25411
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/config06
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+# Empty
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
index d9c662fc5..1f659b95a 100644
--- a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ static const char *kconfigs[] = {
"CONFIG_MMU",
"CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m",
"CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4",
+ "CONFIG_MMU & CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m",
+ "CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m | CONFIG_MMU",
NULL
};
diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ee919dcac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig01.c
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
+ *
+ * Invalid boolean expression test.
+ */
+
+#include "tst_test.h"
+
+static void do_test(void)
+{
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Test passed!");
+}
+
+static const char *kconfigs[] = {
+ "CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m | CONFIG_MMU)",
+ NULL
+};
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+ .test_all = do_test,
+ .needs_kconfigs = kconfigs,
+};
diff --git a/lib/tst_kconfig.c b/lib/tst_kconfig.c
index d49187b6f..468f03a86 100644
--- a/lib/tst_kconfig.c
+++ b/lib/tst_kconfig.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#define TST_NO_DEFAULT_MAIN
#include "tst_test.h"
#include "tst_kconfig.h"
+#include "tst_bool_expr.h"
static const char *kconfig_path(char *path_buf, size_t path_buf_len)
{
@@ -84,126 +85,108 @@ static void close_kconfig(FILE *fp)
fclose(fp);
}
-struct match {
- /* match len, string length up to \0 or = */
- size_t len;
- /* if set part of conf string after = */
- const char *val;
- /* if set the config option was matched already */
- int match;
-};
-
-static int is_set(const char *str, const char *val)
+static inline int kconfig_parse_line(const char *line,
+ struct tst_kconfig_var *vars,
+ unsigned int vars_len)
{
- size_t vlen = strlen(val);
+ unsigned int i, var_len = 0;
+ const char *var;
+ int is_not_set = 0;
- while (isspace(*str))
- str++;
+ while (isspace(*line))
+ line++;
- if (strncmp(str, val, vlen))
- return 0;
+ if (*line == '#') {
+ if (!strstr(line, "is not set"))
+ return 0;
- switch (str[vlen]) {
- case ' ':
- case '\n':
- case '\0':
- return 1;
- break;
- default:
- return 0;
+ is_not_set = 1;
}
-}
-
-static inline int match(struct match *match, const char *conf,
- struct tst_kconfig_res *result, const char *line)
-{
- if (match->match)
- return 0;
- const char *cfg = strstr(line, "CONFIG_");
+ var = strstr(line, "CONFIG_");
- if (!cfg)
+ if (!var)
return 0;
- if (strncmp(cfg, conf, match->len))
- return 0;
-
- const char *val = &cfg[match->len];
-
- switch (cfg[match->len]) {
- case '=':
+ for (;;) {
+ switch (var[var_len]) {
+ case 'A' ... 'Z':
+ case '0' ... '9':
+ case '_':
+ var_len++;
+ break;
+ default:
+ goto out;
break;
- case ' ':
- if (is_set(val, "is not set")) {
- result->match = 'n';
- goto match;
}
- /* fall through */
- default:
- return 0;
}
- if (is_set(val, "=y")) {
- result->match = 'y';
- goto match;
- }
+out:
- if (is_set(val, "=m")) {
- result->match = 'm';
- goto match;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < vars_len; i++) {
+ const char *val;
+ unsigned int val_len = 0;
- result->match = 'v';
- result->value = strndup(val+1, strlen(val)-2);
+ if (vars[i].id_len != var_len)
+ continue;
-match:
- match->match = 1;
- return 1;
-}
+ if (strncmp(vars[i].id, var, var_len))
+ continue;
-void tst_kconfig_read(const char *const *kconfigs,
- struct tst_kconfig_res results[], size_t cnt)
-{
- struct match matches[cnt];
- FILE *fp;
- unsigned int i, j;
- char buf[1024];
+ if (is_not_set) {
+ vars[i].choice = 'n';
+ return 1;
+ }
- for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
- const char *val = strchr(kconfigs[i], '=');
+ val = var + var_len;
- if (strncmp("CONFIG_", kconfigs[i], 7))
- tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid config string '%s'", kconfigs[i]);
+ while (isspace(*val))
+ val++;
- matches[i].match = 0;
- matches[i].len = strlen(kconfigs[i]);
+ if (*val != '=')
+ return 0;
- if (val) {
- matches[i].val = val + 1;
- matches[i].len -= strlen(val);
+ val++;
+
+ while (isspace(*val))
+ val++;
+
+ while (!isspace(val[val_len]))
+ val_len++;
+
+ if (val_len == 1) {
+ switch (val[0]) {
+ case 'y':
+ vars[i].choice = 'y';
+ return 1;
+ case 'm':
+ vars[i].choice = 'm';
+ return 1;
+ }
}
- results[i].match = 0;
- results[i].value = NULL;
+ vars[i].choice = 'v';
+ vars[i].val = strndup(val, val_len);
}
- fp = open_kconfig();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void tst_kconfig_read(struct tst_kconfig_var vars[], size_t vars_len)
+{
+ char line[128];
+ unsigned int vars_found = 0;
+
+ FILE *fp = open_kconfig();
if (!fp)
tst_brk(TBROK, "Cannot parse kernel .config");
- while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), fp)) {
- for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
- if (match(&matches[i], kconfigs[i], &results[i], buf)) {
- for (j = 0; j < cnt; j++) {
- if (matches[j].match)
- break;
- }
-
- if (j == cnt)
- goto exit;
- }
- }
+ while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), fp)) {
+ if (kconfig_parse_line(line, vars, vars_len))
+ vars_found++;
+ if (vars_found == vars_len)
+ goto exit;
}
exit:
@@ -219,65 +202,198 @@ static size_t array_len(const char *const kconfigs[])
return i;
}
-static int compare_res(struct tst_kconfig_res *res, const char *kconfig,
- char match, const char *val)
+static const char *strnchr(const char *s, int c, unsigned int len)
{
- if (res->match != match) {
- tst_res(TINFO, "Needs kernel %s, have %c", kconfig, res->match);
- return 1;
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (s[i] == c)
+ return s + i;
}
- if (match != 'v')
- return 0;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int get_len(const char* kconfig, unsigned int len)
+{
+ const char *sep = strnchr(kconfig, '=', len);
+
+ if (!sep)
+ return len;
- if (strcmp(res->value, val)) {
- tst_res(TINFO, "Needs kernel %s, have %s", kconfig, res->value);
- return 1;
+ return sep - kconfig;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int get_var_cnt(struct tst_expr *const exprs[],
+ unsigned int expr_cnt)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ const struct tst_expr_tok *j;
+ unsigned int cnt = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < expr_cnt; i++) {
+ for (j = exprs[i]->rpn; j; j = j->next) {
+ if (j->op == TST_OP_VAR)
+ cnt++;
+ }
}
- return 0;
+ return cnt;
}
-void tst_kconfig_check(const char *const kconfigs[])
+static const struct tst_kconfig_var *find_var(const struct tst_kconfig_var vars[],
+ unsigned int var_cnt,
+ const char *var)
{
- size_t cnt = array_len(kconfigs);
- struct tst_kconfig_res results[cnt];
unsigned int i;
- int abort_test = 0;
- tst_kconfig_read(kconfigs, results, cnt);
+ for (i = 0; i < var_cnt; i++) {
+ if (!strcmp(vars[i].id, var))
+ return &vars[i];
+ }
- for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
- if (results[i].match == 0) {
- tst_res(TINFO, "Missing kernel %s", kconfigs[i]);
- abort_test = 1;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fill in the kconfig variables array from the expressions. Also makes sure
+ * that each variable is copied to the array exaclty once.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int populate_vars(struct tst_expr *exprs[],
+ unsigned int expr_cnt,
+ struct tst_kconfig_var vars[])
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ struct tst_expr_tok *j;
+ unsigned int cnt = 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < expr_cnt; i++) {
+ for (j = exprs[i]->rpn; j; j = j->next) {
+ const struct tst_kconfig_var *var;
+
+ if (j->op != TST_OP_VAR)
+ continue;
+
+ vars[cnt].id_len = get_len(j->tok, j->tok_len);
+
+ if (vars[cnt].id_len + 1 >= sizeof(vars[cnt].id))
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "kconfig var id too long!");
+
+ strncpy(vars[cnt].id, j->tok, vars[cnt].id_len);
+ vars[cnt].id[vars[cnt].id_len] = 0;
+ vars[cnt].choice = 0;
+
+ var = find_var(vars, cnt, vars[cnt].id);
+
+ if (var)
+ j->priv = var;
+ else
+ j->priv = &vars[cnt++];
+ }
+ }
+
+ return cnt;
+}
+
+static int map(struct tst_expr_tok *expr)
+{
+ const struct tst_kconfig_var *var = expr->priv;
+
+ if (var->choice == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ const char *val = strnchr(expr->tok, '=', expr->tok_len);
+
+ /* CONFIG_FOO evaluates to true if y or m */
+ if (!val)
+ return var->choice == 'y' || var->choice == 'm';
+
+ val++;
+
+ unsigned int len = expr->tok_len - (val - expr->tok);
+ char choice = 'v';
+
+ if (!strncmp(val, "n", len))
+ choice = 'n';
+
+ if (!strncmp(val, "y", len))
+ choice = 'y';
+
+ if (!strncmp(val, "m", len))
+ choice = 'm';
+
+ if (choice != 'v')
+ return var->choice == choice;
+
+ if (strlen(var->val) != len)
+ return 0;
+
+ return !strncmp(val, var->val, len);
+}
+
+static void dump_vars(const struct tst_expr *expr)
+{
+ const struct tst_expr_tok *i;
+ const struct tst_kconfig_var *var;
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Variables:");
+
+ for (i = expr->rpn; i; i = i->next) {
+ if (i->op != TST_OP_VAR)
+ continue;
+
+ var = i->priv;
+
+ if (!var->choice) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, " %s Undefined", var->id);
continue;
}
- if (results[i].match == 'n') {
- tst_res(TINFO, "Kernel %s is not set", kconfigs[i]);
- abort_test = 1;
+ if (var->choice == 'v') {
+ tst_res(TINFO, " %s=%s", var->id, var->val);
continue;
}
- const char *val = strchr(kconfigs[i], '=');
+ tst_res(TINFO, " %s=%c", var->id, var->choice);
+ }
+}
- if (val) {
- char match = 'v';
- val++;
+void tst_kconfig_check(const char *const kconfigs[])
+{
+ size_t expr_cnt = array_len(kconfigs);
+ struct tst_expr *exprs[expr_cnt];
+ unsigned int i, var_cnt;
+ int abort_test = 0;
- if (!strcmp(val, "y"))
- match = 'y';
+ for (i = 0; i < expr_cnt; i++) {
+ exprs[i] = tst_bool_expr_parse(kconfigs[i]);
- if (!strcmp(val, "m"))
- match = 'm';
+ if (!exprs[i])
+ tst_brk(TBROK, "Invalid kconfig expression!");
+ }
- if (compare_res(&results[i], kconfigs[i], match, val))
- abort_test = 1;
+ var_cnt = get_var_cnt(exprs, expr_cnt);
+ struct tst_kconfig_var vars[var_cnt];
+ var_cnt = populate_vars(exprs, expr_cnt, vars);
+
+ tst_kconfig_read(vars, var_cnt);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < expr_cnt; i++) {
+ int val = tst_bool_expr_eval(exprs[i], map);
+
+ if (val != 1) {
+ abort_test = 1;
+ tst_res(TINFO, "Constrain '%s' not satisfied!", kconfigs[i]);
+ dump_vars(exprs[i]);
}
- free(results[i].value);
+ tst_bool_expr_free(exprs[i]);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < var_cnt; i++) {
+ if (vars[i].choice == 'v')
+ free(vars[i].val);
}
if (abort_test)
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
index 8ee1bfcf8..1bf6378db 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/acct/acct02.c
@@ -49,18 +49,20 @@ static union acct_union {
struct acct_v3 v3;
} acct_struct;
+#define ACCT_V3 "CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3"
+
static int acct_version_is_3(void)
{
- const char *kconfig_acct_v3[] = {
- "CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT_V3",
- NULL
+ struct tst_kconfig_var kconfig = {
+ .id = ACCT_V3,
+ .id_len = sizeof(ACCT_V3)-1,
};
- struct tst_kconfig_res results[1];
+ tst_kconfig_read(&kconfig, 1);
- tst_kconfig_read(kconfig_acct_v3, results, 1);
+ tst_res(TINFO, ACCT_V3 "=%c", kconfig.choice);
- return results[0].match == 'y';
+ return kconfig.choice == 'y';
}
static void run_command(void)
--
2.26.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval Cyril Hrubis
@ 2020-11-04 13:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
2020-11-06 8:10 ` Xiao Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Richard Palethorpe @ 2020-11-04 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hello,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:
> Add a simple and generic boolean expression parser and evaluator. This
> is a first step in order to implement more complex kconfig expressions,
> but since we are likely to reuse the parser for other purposes in the
> future it's implemented as a generic boolean parser.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
LGTM!
--
Thank you,
Richard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval Cyril Hrubis
@ 2020-11-06 8:09 ` Xiao Yang
2020-11-06 10:21 ` Li Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Yang @ 2020-11-06 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On 2020/11/4 0:10, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Now each string in the kconfig[] array in tst_test structure is an
> boolean expression which is evaluated. All expressions has to be true in
> order for the test to continue.
>
> This also makes the parser for the kernel config a bit more robust as it
> was pointed out that there may have been cases where it could be mislead
> by hand edited config files.
>
> + Update the docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis<chrubis@suse.cz>
> CC: Pengfei Xu<pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Hi Cyril,
LGTM. :-)
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-04 13:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
@ 2020-11-06 8:10 ` Xiao Yang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Yang @ 2020-11-06 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On 2020/11/4 0:10, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Add a simple and generic boolean expression parser and evaluator. This
> is a first step in order to implement more complex kconfig expressions,
> but since we are likely to reuse the parser for other purposes in the
> future it's implemented as a generic boolean parser.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis<chrubis@suse.cz>
Hi Cyril,
LGTM. :-)
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-06 8:09 ` Xiao Yang
@ 2020-11-06 10:21 ` Li Wang
2020-11-06 10:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2020-11-06 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:10 AM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Now each string in the kconfig[] array in tst_test structure is an
> boolean expression which is evaluated. All expressions has to be true in
> order for the test to continue.
>
> This also makes the parser for the kernel config a bit more robust as it
> was pointed out that there may have been cases where it could be mislead
> by hand edited config files.
>
> + Update the docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
> CC: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
>
For series:
Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
> b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
> index d9c662fc5..1f659b95a 100644
> --- a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
> +++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ static const char *kconfigs[] = {
> "CONFIG_MMU",
> "CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m",
> "CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4",
> + "CONFIG_MMU & CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m",
> + "CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m | CONFIG_MMU",
> NULL
> };
>
I tried with more complicated configurations for test parsing, most works
as expected but except the below one with parentheses ():
"CONFIG_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME=\"(none)\"",
That's because the parentheses are the element of expression and used
to distinguish tokens, I?m not sure whether we can change it as a general
character to fix this problem, if no, we might need to comment on this in
the documentation.
--- a/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
+++ b/lib/newlib_tests/test_kconfig.c
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ static const char *kconfigs[] = {
"CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS=4",
"CONFIG_MMU & CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m",
"CONFIG_EXT4_FS=m | CONFIG_MMU",
+ "CONFIG_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME=\"(none)\"",
+ "CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=\"\" | CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_HASH=\"sha256\"",
+ "CONFIG_OUTPUT_FORMAT=\"elf64-x86-64\"",
+ "CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG=\"arch/x86/configs/x86_64_defconfig\"",
+ "CONFIG_ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE=0xdead000000000000",
NULL
};
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20201106/f78e1a20/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-06 10:21 ` Li Wang
@ 2020-11-06 10:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-06 10:32 ` Li Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-11-06 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi!
> I tried with more complicated configurations for test parsing, most works
> as expected but except the below one with parentheses ():
>
> "CONFIG_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME=\"(none)\"",
>
> That's because the parentheses are the element of expression and used
> to distinguish tokens, I???m not sure whether we can change it as a general
> character to fix this problem, if no, we might need to comment on this in
> the documentation.
Well we would have to teach the tokenizer about strings, i.e. treat
everything inside of double quotes as single token. That shouldn't be
that hard, I can try to add this later on.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-06 10:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2020-11-06 10:32 ` Li Wang
2020-11-09 14:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Li Wang @ 2020-11-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 6:30 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
> > I tried with more complicated configurations for test parsing, most works
> > as expected but except the below one with parentheses ():
> >
> > "CONFIG_DEFAULT_HOSTNAME=\"(none)\"",
> >
> > That's because the parentheses are the element of expression and used
> > to distinguish tokens, I???m not sure whether we can change it as a
> general
> > character to fix this problem, if no, we might need to comment on this in
> > the documentation.
>
> Well we would have to teach the tokenizer about strings, i.e. treat
> everything inside of double quotes as single token. That shouldn't be
> that hard, I can try to add this later on.
>
That would be great, thank you!
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20201106/aaf5cc1a/attachment.htm>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval
2020-11-06 10:32 ` Li Wang
@ 2020-11-09 14:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2020-11-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ltp
Hi!
> That would be great, thank you!
I've pushed the patches for now, since I want to finally fix
umip_basic_test and I will send a follow-up patch for the tokenizer
soon.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-09 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-03 16:10 [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for kconfig constraints Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] lib: Add generic boolean expression parser and eval Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-04 13:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
2020-11-06 8:10 ` Xiao Yang
2020-11-03 16:10 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 2/2] lib/tst_kconfig: Make use of boolean expression eval Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-06 8:09 ` Xiao Yang
2020-11-06 10:21 ` Li Wang
2020-11-06 10:31 ` Cyril Hrubis
2020-11-06 10:32 ` Li Wang
2020-11-09 14:10 ` Cyril Hrubis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).