public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yangx.jy <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 22:39:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5FF47A04.4030908@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/Rre6xb0cAg1Emw@yuki.lan>

On 2021/1/5 21:36, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> In Summary output, avoid counting the double passed for one test:
>> -------------------------------------
>> ./open01
>> tst_test.c:1261: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
>> open01.c:48: TPASS: open() with sticky bit returned fd 3
>> open01.c:59: TPASS: sticky bit is set as expected
>> open01.c:48: TPASS: open() with sirectory bit returned fd 3
>> open01.c:59: TPASS: sirectory bit is set as expected
>>
>> Summary:
>> passed   4
>> failed   0
>> broken   0
>> skipped  0
>> warnings 0
>> -------------------------------------
> What exactly is the problem of having TPASS generated for each open()
> that produces a valid file descriptor in the open testcases?
>
> These macros are especially tailored to generate TPASS/TFAIL messages so
> that the caller does not have to. So even if having two TPASS per run()
> function in open01 was a problem, which I do not think is the case, we
> should just use SAFE_OPEN() there instead.
Hi Cyril,

I perfer to report one TPASS message when finishing one subtest instead 
of one step.
     because of two reasons:
    a) It seems clearer for user to know how many subtests were run 
sucessfully.
    b) There are too many TPASS/TFAIL messages when a testcase(e.g. 
open11) contains many subtests or multiple TST_EXP_* macros.
Could we make TST_EXP_* macros do common check and generate only TFAIL 
messages? (Make testcases report TPASS message by themself)

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang




  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-05 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-04 12:54 [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/open01.c: Don't continue when open() failed Xiao Yang
2021-01-04 12:54 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded Xiao Yang
2021-01-04 13:07   ` yangx.jy
2021-01-05 13:38     ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 13:36   ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 14:39     ` yangx.jy [this message]
2021-01-05 15:03       ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-10 13:04         ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Add TST_EXP_SILENT_{PASS, FD} macros Xiao Yang
2021-01-10 13:04           ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] syscalls/access02.c: Take use of TST_EXP_SILENT_PASS Xiao Yang
2021-01-11 14:07           ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Add TST_EXP_SILENT_{PASS, FD} macros Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-10 13:48         ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH 2/2] include/tst_test_macros.h: Report TINFO when TST_EXP_FD() succeeded yangx.jy
2021-01-05 13:15 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/2] syscalls/open01.c: Don't continue when open() failed Cyril Hrubis
2021-01-05 14:20   ` yangx.jy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5FF47A04.4030908@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox