From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:25:07 +0000 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/3] syscalls/semctl01: Convert into new api In-Reply-To: References: <1616497037-19158-1-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <1616497037-19158-3-git-send-email-xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com> <46e7a46a-f3d2-078d-1126-5a8679cea7be@oracle.com> <606E7268.8000603@fujitsu.com> <6070177F.8060404@fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <607039A2.3010705@fujitsu.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hi Cyril > Hi! >>>> To ensure ftok succeed, we must require root. Or, modify GETIPCKEY api, >>>> we can use tmp directory. Anyhow, I will send a v2 to remove useless >>>> funtion declartion firstly. >>> >>> Unless we are sharing the semaphore with a process that wasn't worked >>> from the test process we can also pass IPC_PRIVATE instead of the key. >> >> My ltp working directory is /root/ltp, then run "su xuyang" to run >> semctl01 case under /root/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ipc/semctl, then >> I got ftok failure as below: >> >> [xuyang@localhost semctl]$ ./semctl01 >> tst_test.c:1289: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s >> libnewipc.c:44: TBROK: ftok() failed at semctl01.c:308: EACCES (13) >> >> I guess this situation maybe meaningless(Usually, user has access >> privilege for their ltp directory or install directory ). So needs_root >> is useless. >> >> I guess maintainers can remove this directly instead of sending a v3. > > The point I was trying to make is that you can pass IPC_PRIVATE instead > of the key to semget() and you don't have to use ftok() at all. Now, I see. Thanks. Will send a v3. >