From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B5FAC02192 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4B53C8EA8 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:41:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1703C8E71 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:41:32 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.de (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=akumar@suse.de; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F32631CE3 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:41:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE5E1F37C; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:41:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738575689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYSApYWNXRn6qutZo2pab5WMNWSmQqOB+eM7A4XlldU=; b=V3hX1W24FwEK6MT+Ter0HbtKrm5m/PHDrRnJfFA/yzVn67acGsyqkDAzMi42MqoF/HwhlH lXVH9LSrlB+gaNXp+SJ0HsILv6HFiK3dv5WKT5GG8F7+M6vNvSoIw76e98ITpff/W5MlTY MJI2wtRSQvhoGxGN1AIM0nDYRzzVbHY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738575689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYSApYWNXRn6qutZo2pab5WMNWSmQqOB+eM7A4XlldU=; b=SYxbdEaTC3GlGYUJXX51/B+18uHmKMscI72DP95sZ7WszInxjlAfIxfwh95EbjeeNHUpE/ PkDpe+C1tiEWoVAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738575689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYSApYWNXRn6qutZo2pab5WMNWSmQqOB+eM7A4XlldU=; b=V3hX1W24FwEK6MT+Ter0HbtKrm5m/PHDrRnJfFA/yzVn67acGsyqkDAzMi42MqoF/HwhlH lXVH9LSrlB+gaNXp+SJ0HsILv6HFiK3dv5WKT5GG8F7+M6vNvSoIw76e98ITpff/W5MlTY MJI2wtRSQvhoGxGN1AIM0nDYRzzVbHY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738575689; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYSApYWNXRn6qutZo2pab5WMNWSmQqOB+eM7A4XlldU=; b=SYxbdEaTC3GlGYUJXX51/B+18uHmKMscI72DP95sZ7WszInxjlAfIxfwh95EbjeeNHUpE/ PkDpe+C1tiEWoVAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EC3D13A78; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 09:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id MAklB0mPoGfKZAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 09:41:29 +0000 From: Avinesh Kumar To: Petr Vorel Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 10:41:28 +0100 Message-ID: <6151942.lOV4Wx5bFT@thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20250131110136.GB1097590@pevik> References: <20240530144406.7626-1-akumar@suse.de> <6145632.lOV4Wx5bFT@thinkpad> <20250131110136.GB1097590@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:email] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v3] flock: Add test for verifying EINTR errno X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" On Friday, January 31, 2025 12:01:36 PM CET Petr Vorel wrote: > > On Monday, October 21, 2024 9:55:21 PM CET Petr Vorel wrote: > > > Hi Avinesh, Yang Xu, > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Xu > > > > Signed-off-by: Avinesh Kumar > > > ... > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/flock/flock07.c > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > > > +/* > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2024 FUJITSU LIMITED. All Rights Reserved. > > > > + * Author: Yang Xu > > > > + * Copyright (c) 2024 Linux Test Project > > > > + */ > > > > + > > > > +/*\ > > > > + * [Description] > > > > + * > > > > + * Verify that flock(2) fails with errno EINTR when waiting to acquire a lock, > > > > + * and the call is interrupted by a signal. > > > > Avinesh, you mentioned at Yang Xu's v1 [1] that EINTR test is getting timed out > > > randomly. I also experienced timeouts on aarch64 and ppc64le. v1 had 2 tests > > > (EINTR and EWOULDBLOCK), you here posted only EINTR. I would expect you would > > > put here only the other one - EWOULDBLOCK. Or am I missing something? > > Hi Petr, > > > I am sorry, I completely missed this. > > I sent the patch for EWOULDBLOCK case now - > > https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20250114155013.7644-1-akumar@suse.de/T/#u > > Thanks for info. I'm closing this as rejected. Please let me know if I did not > understand you and this is a valid patch. Hi Petr, the above v3 patch (for new test of flock/EINTR errno) is still valid. I took out the EWOULDBLOCK test from the original patch (by Yang Xu) and added that to flock02, you already merged that one. So you can review flock07.c patch just for the EINTR case. Thanks, Avinesh > > Kind regards, > Petr > > > Regards, > > Avinesh > > > > Kind regards, > > > Petr > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/1934768.7Z3S40VBb9@localhost/ > > > > > > -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp