Re: [LTP] [PATCH 2/2] scenario_groups/default: Add irq into default run

["xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>]

Hi Richard
> Hello,
> 
> Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>  writes:
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   scenario_groups/default | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scenario_groups/default b/scenario_groups/default
>> index 439783dac..1dc2987d5 100644
>> --- a/scenario_groups/default
>> +++ b/scenario_groups/default
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ dio
>>   io
>>   mm
>>   ipc
>> +irq
>>   sched
>>   math
>>   nptl
>> -- 
>> 2.23.0
> 
> I'm not sure this should go in the default group at this time. The only
> test in irq (irqbalance), only works on some configurations. As
> discussed in the test review, the user must figure out if they should
> run it or not.

It is hard to say moving this case into default run at this time is good
or bad.

With an optimistic attitude, I want to add it into default run(add some
comment in irqbalance01.c that irqbalance01 may fail because it needs
some configuration in service or hardware)and then listen whether many
users complain about this failure.

ps: Many people still use runltp to test ltp instead of runltp-ng and
they usually only run default group. That is a important reason that I
want to add this case into default group.
> 
> Perhaps we need a new scenario group?
I don't have objection. So do you want to cover what scenario(advanced
or experimental scenario group)?

Best Regards
Yang Xu
> 

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp