Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] doc/maintainer: Add policy for new functionality

["xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>]

Hi!
> Hi!
>>> +* Tests for new functionality in mainline kernel should be merged after final
>>> +  release of kernel which contains that functionality (it's not enough when the
>>> +  feature gets into rc1, because it can be reverted in later rc if
>>> problematic).
>>
>> What is the concern? All I can see is that we merge a test which is for
>> a feature that is never included
>
> Not only that, the interface may change subtly.
>
>> The issue is we may forget to merge patch sets for features which are
>> included (a far worse result). It's more stuff waiting around in the
>> queue. At the least we should have a procedure for tracking them (like
>> tagging github issues for review at each mainline release).
>>
>> If a test requires a kernel config which doesn't exist in mainline we
>> could also look for that automatically.
>
> The main issue is that if we happen to release LTP meanwhile with a test
> for a syscall that didn't get included in the mainline in the end we
> have released LTP that is supposed to be stable and the test will start
> to fail when the syscall number is allocated for something else which
> will happen sooner or later.
I know a example that is quotactl_path syscall.
>

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp