From: "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
To: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@redhat.com>,
"ltp@lists.linux.it" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/3] lib: enhance .save_restore to support set expected value
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:43:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6229AC3C.2040608@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220309030440.4166954-2-liwang@redhat.com>
Hi Li
>
> diff --git a/include/tst_test.h b/include/tst_test.h
> index 816fab4dd..e514efa76 100644
> --- a/include/tst_test.h
> +++ b/include/tst_test.h
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ struct tst_test {
> * NULL terminated array of (/proc, /sys) files to save
> * before setup and restore after cleanup
> */
> - const char * const *save_restore;
> + const struct tst_path_val const *save_restore;
Ci complains about duplicate const see the following url
https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/runs/5491806027?check_suite_focus=true#step:10:19
How about using const struct tst_path_val *save_restore like
other struct pointer( struct tst_cap *caps, const struct tst_tag *tags)?
Best Regards
Yang Xu
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 7:37 [LTP] [PATCH 0/4] enhance .save_restore to support set value Li Wang
2022-03-08 7:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/4] lib: move struct tst_sys_conf to internal Li Wang
2022-03-08 12:25 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-03-08 7:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/4] lib: enhance .save_restore to support set expected value Li Wang
2022-03-08 13:02 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-03-09 2:27 ` Li Wang
2022-03-08 7:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/4] testcase: switch to the new .save_restore Li Wang
2022-03-08 13:05 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-03-08 7:37 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/4] ksm: cleanup work and make use of .save_restore Li Wang
2022-03-08 13:20 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-03-09 3:04 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/3] lib: move struct tst_sys_conf to internal Li Wang
2022-03-09 3:04 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/3] lib: enhance .save_restore to support set expected value Li Wang
2022-03-09 10:00 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-03-10 1:26 ` Li Wang
2022-03-10 7:43 ` xuyang2018.jy [this message]
2022-03-10 7:53 ` Li Wang
2022-03-10 8:01 ` xuyang2018.jy
2022-03-09 3:04 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] ksm: cleanup work and make use of .save_restore Li Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6229AC3C.2040608@fujitsu.com \
--to=xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=bgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=liwang@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox