Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: "Wake Liu via ltp" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Cc: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] listmount04: Allow both EINVAL and EBADF for BEFORE_6_17_9 case
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 11:11:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69f87edb.5d0a0220.e12b4.1927@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430112346.4054436-1-wakel@google.com>

Hi Wake,

> On some LTS kernels (like 6.12.y or 6.6.y), the bug fix
> commit 78f0e33cd6c9 ("fs/namespace: correctly handle errors returned
> by grab_requested_mnt_ns") was backported.

Actually that commit is included from 6.18, which make it non-available
also in 6.17.9. The `BEFORE_6_17_9` variable excludes 6.17.9 (equivalent
to < operation).

This means the patch is not resolving the issue for that specific kernel,
but only for the kernels before that commit. Is that correct?

For instance, the patch fails with `v6.18-rc1-118-ga3f8f8662771`:

tst_test.c:2042: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.18.0-rc1-virtme #9 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon May  4 13:01:41 CEST 2026 x86_64
tst_kconfig.c:90: TINFO: Parsing kernel config '/lib/modules/6.18.0-rc1-virtme/build/.config'
tst_test.c:1867: TINFO: Overall timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: request points to unaccessible memory : EFAULT (14)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: mnt_ids points to unaccessible memory : EFAULT (14)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: invalid flags : EINVAL (22)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: insufficient mnt_id_req.size : EINVAL (22)
listmount04.c:141: TCONF: Test not suitable for current kernel version
listmount04.c:161: TFAIL: invalid mnt_id_req.mnt_ns_fd expected EBADF: EINVAL (22)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: invalid mnt_id_req.param : EINVAL (22)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: invalid mnt_id_req.mnt_id : EINVAL (22)
listmount04.c:161: TPASS: non-existant mnt_id : ENOENT (2)

Summary:
passed   7
failed   1
broken   0
skipped  1
warnings 0

I guess the choice is to use EINVAL when >= 6.18. EBADF otherwise.

Kind regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 11:23 [LTP] [PATCH] listmount04: Allow both EINVAL and EBADF for BEFORE_6_17_9 case Wake Liu via ltp
2026-04-30 11:37 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-05-04 11:11 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69f87edb.5d0a0220.e12b4.1927@mx.google.com \
    --to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=wakel@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox