From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:25:32 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/removexattr02:skip the test if no xattr
 support
In-Reply-To: <576D33A0.7090607@oracle.com>
References: <1466739362-5914-1-git-send-email-shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
 <1959236773.1678649.1466772016581.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <576D33A0.7090607@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <700268822.1709686.1466774732520.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it





----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shuang Qiu" <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
> To: "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Sent: Friday, 24 June, 2016 3:20:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/removexattr02:skip the test if no xattr support
> 
> On 06/24/2016 08:40 PM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "shuang qiu" <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
> >> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> >> Sent: Friday, 24 June, 2016 5:36:02 AM
> >> Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/removexattr02:skip the test if no xattr
> >> 	support
> >>
> >> From: Shuang Qiu <shuang.qiu@oracle.com>
> >>
> >> Return TCONF if there is no xattr support in fs or mount without
> >> user_xattr
> >> option
> > Why only in removexattr02? Should we do the same for removexattr01?
> removexattr01 already handle such situation.

Sorry, I missed that. Pushed with curly brackets around if.

Regards,
Jan


> 
> Thanks
> Shuang
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jan
> 
>