public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 06:04:50 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <799714053.10227172.1470045890634.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470040135-26072-1-git-send-email-liwang@redhat.com>





----- Original Message -----
> From: "Li Wang" <liwang@redhat.com>
> To: ltp@lists.linux.it
> Cc: jstancek@redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, 1 August, 2016 10:28:55 AM
> Subject: [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available
> 
> On some ppc64 systems, there free memory are larger than available memory,
> but
> total swap size is very small. Then this swapping01 easily get failures like:
> 
> swapping01    0  TINFO  :  free physical memory: 14651 MB
> swapping01    0  TINFO  :  try to allocate: 19046 MB
> swapping01    1  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:134: malloc: errno=ENOMEM(12): Cannot
> allocate memory
> swapping01    2  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:134: Remaining cases broken
> swapping01    1  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:151: child was not stopped.
> swapping01    2  TBROK  :  swapping01.c:151: Remaining cases broken
> 
>  # free -m
>                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache
>                available
>  Mem:          15316         238       14651           0         427
>  14478
>  Swap:          4607         202        4405
> 
> That's because 14478(available_mem) + 4405(swap_free) < 19046(expected:
> 14651(free_mem) * 1.3),
> so we get malloc ENOMEM errors.
> 
> In this patch:
>   * replace the free memory by available
>   * compare total swap with mem_over_max
>   * take new method to monitor swap usage
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c | 56
>  ++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> index b530ee2..20bd254 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/swapping/swapping01.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,9 @@ static void init_meminfo(void);
>  static void do_alloc(void);
>  static void check_swapping(void);
>  
> -static long mem_free_init;
> +static long mem_available_init;
>  static long swap_free_init;
> +static long swap_total;
>  static long mem_over;
>  static long mem_over_max;
>  static pid_t pid;
> @@ -107,20 +108,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>  static void init_meminfo(void)
>  {
> +	swap_total = read_meminfo("SwapTotal:");
>  	swap_free_init = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
> -	mem_free_init = read_meminfo("MemFree:");
> -	mem_over = mem_free_init * COE_SLIGHT_OVER;
> -	mem_over_max = mem_free_init * COE_DELTA;
> -
> -	/* at least 10MB free physical memory needed */
> -	if (mem_free_init < 10240) {
> -		sleep(5);
> -		if (mem_free_init < 10240)
> +	if (FILE_LINES_SCANF(cleanup, "/proc/meminfo", "MemAvailable: %ld",
> +				&mem_available_init))
> +		mem_available_init = read_meminfo("MemFree:") + read_meminfo("Cached:");
> +	mem_over = mem_available_init * COE_SLIGHT_OVER;
> +	mem_over_max = mem_available_init * COE_DELTA;
> +
> +	/* at least 10MB available physical memory needed */
> +	if (mem_available_init < 10240)
>  			tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup,
> -				 "Not enough free memory to test.");
> -	}
> -	if (swap_free_init < mem_over)
> -		tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "Not enough swap space to test.");
> +				 "Not enough avalable memory to test.");
> +
> +	if (swap_total < mem_over_max)
> +		tst_brkm(TCONF, cleanup, "swap size is not fit to test");

Shouldn't this be "swap_free_init > mem_over_max"? Some of the swap
can be used at the start of test and condition below compares the
difference from initial value.

>  }
>  
>  static void do_alloc(void)
> @@ -128,8 +130,8 @@ static void do_alloc(void)
>  	long mem_count;
>  	void *s;
>  
> -	tst_resm(TINFO, "free physical memory: %ld MB", mem_free_init / 1024);
> -	mem_count = mem_free_init + mem_over;
> +	tst_resm(TINFO, "available physical memory: %ld MB", mem_available_init /
> 1024);
> +	mem_count = mem_available_init + mem_over;
>  	tst_resm(TINFO, "try to allocate: %ld MB", mem_count / 1024);
>  	s = malloc(mem_count * 1024);
>  	if (s == NULL)
> @@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ static void do_alloc(void)
>  static void check_swapping(void)
>  {
>  	int status, i;
> -	long swapped;
> +	long swap_free_now, swapped;
>  
>  	/* wait child stop */
>  	if (waitpid(pid, &status, WUNTRACED) == -1)
> @@ -153,15 +155,23 @@ static void check_swapping(void)
>  		tst_brkm(TBROK, cleanup, "child was not stopped.");
>  
>  	/* Still occupying memory, loop for a while */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> -		swapped = swap_free_init - read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
> -		if (swapped > mem_over_max) {
> -			kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> -			tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "heavy swapping detected: "
> -				 "%ld MB swapped.", swapped / 1024);
> -		}
> +	i = 0;
> +	while (i < 10) {
> +		swap_free_now = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
>  		sleep(1);
> +		if (abs(swap_free_now - read_meminfo("SwapFree:")) < 512)
> +			break;
> +
> +		i++;
>  	}
> +

I'd probably add here:
  swap_free_now = read_meminfo("SwapFree:");
again, since current value can be stale.

Regards,
Jan

> +	swapped = swap_free_init - swap_free_now;
> +	if (swapped > mem_over_max) {
> +		kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> +		tst_brkm(TFAIL, cleanup, "heavy swapping detected: "
> +				"%ld MB swapped.", swapped / 1024);
> +	}
> +
>  	tst_resm(TPASS, "no heavy swapping detected, %ld MB swapped.",
>  		 swapped / 1024);
>  	kill(pid, SIGCONT);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01  8:28 [LTP] [PATCH v2] swapping: replace mem_free by mem_available Li Wang
2016-08-01 10:04 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2016-08-01 10:37   ` Li Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=799714053.10227172.1470045890634.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox