From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: add tst_get_timeout()
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 03:18:06 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <800967112.43399023.1535527086665.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEemH2cd9_j+g0suRSEXw2UyM+XrPnWUv5UaLCybk8WeikxyFA@mail.gmail.com>
----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > > It's just an idea, but we can make this even more elegant API.
> > > >
> > > > We measure the time in the test library anyway, so what about we added
> > > > something as tst_timeout_reached() that would return number of seconds
> > > > remaining to 80% of the real timeout or 0 if in a case that the timeout
> > > > was reached. Then we can use this as a soft-timeout in all the
> > testcases
> > > > without any additional steps.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cyril Hrubis
> > > > chrubis@suse.cz
> > >
> > > 80% is probably way more than many of the CVE test cases need unless the
> > > overall timeout is reduced from 5 minutes. Probably 20% would be
> > > OK. Assuming this is the kind of usage scenario you had in mind.
> >
> > I'd leave it to user. Give him data how much time is left,
> > and let him decide what is sensible limit for soft-timeout.
> >
> > Hmm, I'm not sure if I have any misunderstood on Cyril's words. But from
> what I think, maybe we also could give more flexible to customize the
> soft-timeout as tst_timeout_reached(0.8) to return true when testcase
> reached 80% of the real timeout. This makes thing more easier and can
> satisfy some kind of demanded.
Sure, but then we are always working with ratios, and can't do something like
"15 seconds before timeout do X".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-28 11:07 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: add tst_get_timeout() Jan Stancek
2018-08-28 11:07 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] move_pages12: end early if runtime gets close to test time Jan Stancek
2018-08-28 12:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib: add tst_get_timeout() Li Wang
2018-08-28 12:58 ` Cyril Hrubis
2018-08-28 14:20 ` Richard Palethorpe
2018-08-28 14:38 ` Jan Stancek
2018-08-29 4:52 ` Li Wang
2018-08-29 7:18 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=800967112.43399023.1535527086665.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox