From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] [RFC] pselect01: Tune thresholds
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 05:45:13 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <833996051.19688092.1495532713977.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523091608.GA18460@rei.lan>
----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > > Hmm, strange, it looks like for 100us we got more or less all samples
> > > close to 160us but for 500us half of the samples are close to 560us and
> > > about 400 is more than 1000us, that does not look right. I wonder what
> > > happens there. And the same for the rest of the measurements everything
> > > but 100us sleeps has two peaks that are more or less 500us apart. So far
> > > my machines, even VMs, had one peak and some outliners.
> > >
> > > Can you try to rerun the test with a realtime priority?
> >
> > Ran as "chrt -f 50 ./measure", results attached.
> >
>
> Looks more or less the same and I still cannot reproduce the issue on
> any of the machines I have here.
>
> Looking at errata for AMD cpus #778 says that TSC may drift under some
> circumstances:
> http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/51810_16h_00h-0Fh_Rev_Guide.pdf#unique_29
>
> Can you try to disable P-state in BIOS or set cpufreq to performance?
Not sure if I can get easily to BIOS, it's a system in remote location.
As for cpufreq, it already was set to performance:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/scaling_governor
performance
performance
performance
performance
Regards,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-23 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 14:16 [LTP] [PATCH v2] [RFC] pselect01: Tune thresholds Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 10:03 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-15 10:20 ` Xiao Yang
2017-05-15 13:15 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-15 13:23 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 12:36 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 13:00 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-15 13:13 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-15 13:16 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 8:39 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 12:04 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-22 13:37 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 13:19 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-22 14:57 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-22 15:15 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-23 7:54 ` Jan Stancek
2017-05-23 9:16 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-05-23 9:45 ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-06-02 12:48 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=833996051.19688092.1495532713977.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox