From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Paulson Raja L <lpaulsonraja@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] RFC:[PATCH v1] Added testcase to test mmap with MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qmaulfg.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+O3cCQk5CEKTqdCkHnMmAwqWF8ePeGOOuHXKBMPqsqwvv7ihA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
In principal the test is good, you can remove the RFC.
Please see comments below (in addition to Cyril's).
Paulson Raja L <lpaulsonraja@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch adds a new test case for mmap syscall. It tests the
> MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag of mmap. The code checks of the
> MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag return EOPNOTSUPP when mapped with an invalid flag
> value. It does so by setting the unused bits of the flag argument.
Would it be possible to use two incompatible flags together instead?
Unused flags can become valid at a later date.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulson Raja L. <lpaulsonraja@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap20.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap20.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..2f6dd5d4d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mmap/mmap20.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +//SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +
> +/*
> + * Test mmap with MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag
> + *
> + * We are testing the MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag of mmap() syscall. To check
> + * if there is an invalid flag value, the MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE return
> + * EOPNOTSUPP. The unused bit in the MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE is found, and by
> + * setting the unused bits of the flag argument the flag value becomes
> + * invalid and the error EOPNOTSUPP is produced as expected.
> + */
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#define TEST_FILE "file_to_mmap"
> +#define TEST_FILE_SIZE 1024
> +#define TEST_FILE_MODE 0600
> +
> +static int fd_file;
> +static void *mapped_address = NULL;
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + fd_file = SAFE_OPEN(TEST_FILE, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, TEST_FILE_MODE);
> + if (tst_fill_file(TEST_FILE, 'a', TEST_FILE_SIZE, 1))
> + tst_brk(TBROK, "Could not fill the testfile.");
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + if (fd_file > 0)
It's unlikely, but possible that fd_file is 0, so it should be
initialised to -1 and we check it is > -1.
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_file);
> + if (mapped_address != NULL && mapped_address != MAP_FAILED)
> + SAFE_MUNMAP(mapped_address, TEST_FILE_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_mmap(void)
> +{
> + mapped_address = mmap(NULL, TEST_FILE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + (1 << 7) | (1 << 9) | MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE, fd_file, 0);
The TEST macro can be used here, which will set errno=0. Possibly errno
is already set to some previous error. (also note you need to then use
TTERRNO below)
> + if (mapped_address != MAP_FAILED)
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO, "mmap() is successful, but it should have
> failed.");
> + else if (errno == EOPNOTSUPP)
> + tst_res(TPASS, "mmap() failed with errno set to EOPNOTSUPP.");
> + else
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TERRNO, "mmap() failed with unexpected error.");
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .min_kver = "4.15",
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test_all = test_mmap,
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};
--
Thank you,
Richard.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-28 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 8:34 [LTP] RFC:[PATCH v1] Added testcase to test mmap with MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag Paulson Raja L
2023-02-15 15:21 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-02-28 10:20 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qmaulfg.fsf@suse.de \
--to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
--cc=lpaulsonraja@gmail.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox