Re: [LTP] [REGRESSION] lkft ltp for 6763a36

[Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>]

Hello,

Joerg Vehlow <lkml@jv-coder.de> writes:

> Hi Jan,
>
> Am 6/21/2022 um 9:22 AM schrieb Jan Stancek:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:15 AM Joerg Vehlow <lkml@jv-coder.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 6/17/2022 um 3:17 AM schrieb lkft@linaro.org:
>>>> * qemu_i386, ltp-fs-tests
>>>>   - read_all_proc
>>> I've seen this test fail a lot, has anyone ever tried to analyze it? I
>>> was unable to reproduce the problem when running the test in isolation.
>> 
>> I see it hit timeouts too (read_all_sys as well). I think it needs
>> runtime restored to 5minutes as well, atm. it has 30s.
> Didn't think about that, but at least for the failures I've seen, this
> is not the reason. The message printed by the test is "Test timeout 5
> minutes exceeded."
>
> Joerg

The main issue with read_all is that it also acts as a stress
test. Reading some files in proc and sys is very resource intensive
(e.g. due to lock contention) and varies depending on what state the
system is in. On some systems this test will take a long time. Also
there are some files which have to be filtered from the test. This
varies by system as well.

-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp