From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Palethorpe Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 10:04:37 +0200 Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH] newlib: Allow sub-tests to be specified in a list In-Reply-To: <20171003144157.GD11692@rei> References: <20171003135520.19580-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> <20171003144157.GD11692@rei> Message-ID: <8760bvwd7u.fsf@our.domain.is.not.set> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it Hello, Cyril Hrubis writes: > Hi! > That is even more complicated than my patch with array: > > http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2017-July/005132.html > > And Jan didn't even liked mine because it adds complexity complexity > that is uncalled for... I think it is called for (atleast the idea in general is) because it encourages people to write similar tests in a clean way which should save time in the long run. I am hoping someone comes up with an acceptable way of doing it. -- Thank you, Richard.