From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, ltp@lists.linux.it,
sbhat@linux.ibm.com, geetika@linux.ibm.com,
vaibhav@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 4/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs icache-hygiene
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 14:08:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rjcvh9f.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221201122844.142062-5-tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Hello,
Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Migrating the libhugetlbfs/testcases/icache-hygiene.c test
>
> Test Description: Older ppc64 kernels don't properly flush dcache to
> icache before giving a cleared page to userspace. With some exceedingly
> hairy code, this attempts to test for this bug.
>
> This test will never trigger (obviously) on machines with coherent
> icache and dcache (including x86 and POWER5). On any given run,
> even on a buggy kernel there's a chance the bug won't trigger -
> either because we don't get the same physical page back when we
> remap, or because the icache happens to get flushed in the interim.
Compiling with Clang 15.0.5 on x86_64 and upstream kernel 6.0.9 in a KVM
VM the test fails:
sh-5.2# ./hugemmap15
[13712.044617] hugemmap15 (2118): drop_caches: 3
tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 3 hugepage(s) reserved
tst_test.c:1560: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
hugemmap15.c:191: TFAIL: icache unclean
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .needs_root = 1,
> + .mntpoint = MNTPOINT,
> + .needs_hugetlbfs = 1,
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .test_all = run_test,
> + .hugepages = {3, TST_NEEDS},
> +};
> --
> 2.31.1
Again, it would be nice to have the git tag(s) of the fix commit(s) if
possible.
--
Thank you,
Richard.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-12 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 12:28 [LTP] [PATCH 0/8][PART 3] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 1/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs fork-cow Tarun Sahu
2022-12-05 12:28 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-07 12:47 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-12-08 8:54 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 2/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs huge_at_4GB_normal_below Tarun Sahu
2022-12-05 13:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-07 12:54 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 3/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs huge_below_4GB_normal_above Tarun Sahu
2022-12-06 8:57 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-07 12:51 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs icache-hygiene Tarun Sahu
2022-12-12 14:08 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2022-12-13 17:27 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-12-19 21:01 ` Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 5/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs madvise_reserve Tarun Sahu
2022-12-12 14:22 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 6/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs map_high_truncate_2 Tarun Sahu
2022-12-12 14:26 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 7/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs misalign Tarun Sahu
2022-12-12 14:32 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-01 12:28 ` [LTP] [PATCH 8/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs misaligned_offset Tarun Sahu
2022-12-12 14:33 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-12 14:50 ` [LTP] [PATCH 0/8][PART 3] Hugetlb:Migrating the libhugetlbfs tests Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-13 5:00 ` Tarun Sahu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-20 19:15 [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/7][PART 2] " Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH 0/8][PART 3] " Tarun Sahu
2022-12-01 12:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH 4/8] Hugetlb: Migrating libhugetlbfs icache-hygiene Tarun Sahu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rjcvh9f.fsf@suse.de \
--to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=geetika@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=sbhat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tsahu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox