From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 09:53:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a63fsqs3.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6QoLAfvY/W175WH@pevik>
Hello,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> writes:
> Hi Avinesh, Richie,
>
> Generally LGTM, thanks for fixing exfat and vfat.
>
>> > + toolong_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax + 1);
> However, length could be smaller:
> Instead using buf.f_namemax + 1 (1531) also for exfat and vfat,
> invalid length is already buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE + 1
> (256).
>
>> > + if (fs_type == TST_VFAT_MAGIC || fs_type == TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
>> > + valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1);
>> > + else
>> > + valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax - 1);
There is also a memory leak when running with -I. You could just use an
4Kb (PATH_MAX) static buffer as the name. If we find an FS that allows
longer names then we can increase it.
We could also use a guarded buffer (specified in tst_test).
>
>> > - if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
>> > - tst_resm(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "statvfs(%s, ...) failed",
>> > - TEST_PATH);
>> > - } else {
>> > - tst_resm(TPASS, "statvfs(%s, ...) passed", TEST_PATH);
>> > - }
>> > + memset(toolong_fname, 'b', buf.f_namemax + 1);
>> > + if (fs_type == TST_VFAT_MAGIC || fs_type == TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
>> > + memset(valid_fname, 'a', buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1);
>> > + else
>> > + memset(valid_fname, 'a', buf.f_namemax - 1);
> Also valid length is for buf.f_namemax, not buf.f_namemax - 1. I guess -1 is for
> \0 (NULL terminator), but tests work even with just buf.f_namemax.
>
> Also adding variable to hold the length makes source more readable.
> How about this?
>
> struct statvfs buf;
> char *valid_fname, *toolong_fname;
> long fs_type;
> long valid_len;
>
> fs_type = tst_fs_type(TEST_PATH);
>
> TST_EXP_PASS(statvfs(TEST_PATH, &buf));
>
> valid_len = buf.f_namemax;
> if (fs_type == TST_VFAT_MAGIC || fs_type == TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
> valid_len = buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE;
>
> valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(valid_len);
> memset(valid_fname, 'a', valid_len);
>
> toolong_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(valid_len + 1);
> memset(toolong_fname, 'b', valid_len + 1);
>
> Final diff is below.
>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> diff --git testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c
> index 034835da7d..f357855eb1 100644
> --- testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c
> +++ testcases/kernel/syscalls/statvfs/statvfs01.c
> @@ -25,22 +25,21 @@ static void run(void)
> struct statvfs buf;
> char *valid_fname, *toolong_fname;
> long fs_type;
> + long valid_len;
>
> fs_type = tst_fs_type(TEST_PATH);
>
> TST_EXP_PASS(statvfs(TEST_PATH, &buf));
>
> - toolong_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax + 1);
> + valid_len = buf.f_namemax;
> if (fs_type == TST_VFAT_MAGIC || fs_type == TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
> - valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1);
> - else
> - valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(buf.f_namemax - 1);
> + valid_len = buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE;
>
> - memset(toolong_fname, 'b', buf.f_namemax + 1);
> - if (fs_type == TST_VFAT_MAGIC || fs_type == TST_EXFAT_MAGIC)
> - memset(valid_fname, 'a', buf.f_namemax / NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE - 1);
> - else
> - memset(valid_fname, 'a', buf.f_namemax - 1);
> + valid_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(valid_len);
> + memset(valid_fname, 'a', valid_len);
> +
> + toolong_fname = SAFE_MALLOC(valid_len + 1);
> + memset(toolong_fname, 'b', valid_len + 1);
>
> TST_EXP_FD(creat(valid_fname, 0444));
> SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET);
--
Thank you,
Richard.
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-22 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 8:43 [LTP] [PATCH v3] statvfs01: Convert to new LTP API Avinesh Kumar
2022-12-01 11:11 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4] " Avinesh Kumar
2022-12-05 10:38 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-16 10:18 ` Petr Vorel
2022-12-20 7:57 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5] " Avinesh Kumar
2022-12-20 12:07 ` Richard Palethorpe
2022-12-22 9:49 ` Petr Vorel
2022-12-22 9:53 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2022-12-23 14:40 ` Avinesh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a63fsqs3.fsf@suse.de \
--to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox