Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] bpf_prog0[5-7]: Run with kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:22:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a67s2y4t.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv99VtoOhs2m3lSP@pevik>

Hello,

Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> writes:

>> Hi!
>> > I.e. 1 or 2 kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled results bpf() returning EPERM for
>> > *all* users including root. 0 allows running again for all users, but we need
>> > root to set it 0 via .save_restore:
>
>> > tst_sys_conf.c:106: TBROK: Failed to open FILE
>> > '/proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled' for writing: EACCES
>> > (13)
>
>> > Maybe we could change tst_sys_conf_save() not to write the value if value can be
>> > read and is the same (and not run tst_sys_conf_restore() if value was the same).
>
>> That would be a good idea either way.
>
>> The unprivileged_bpf_disabled is more complicated that this though. It's
>> a three state as:
>
>> 0 - enabled
>> 1 - disabled and can't be enabled
>> 2 - disabled and can be enabled
> Good point, I didn't realize 1 means "no" also for root :).

IMO I've always thought that it's not worth tyring to change this value
because of this and also the hopeless nature of unprivileged eBPF.

OTOH if it is set to 1 then we can argue that known bugs should be fixed
because setting it to 1 shows intent to use it.

-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-18 17:17 [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] bpf_prog0[5-7]: Run with kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled = 0 Petr Vorel
2022-08-18 17:50 ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19  8:27 ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-08-19 10:28   ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19 10:31     ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-19 10:43     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-08-19 11:00     ` Cyril Hrubis
2022-08-19 12:08       ` Petr Vorel
2022-08-25 14:22         ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a67s2y4t.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox