Linux Test Project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] Rewrite process_vm01 test using new LTP API
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 08:04:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bks71nwg.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824124017.14286-1-andrea.cervesato@suse.com>

Hello,

Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it> writes:

> -static void cma_test_invalid_perm(void)
> +static void test_invalid_perm(void)
>  {
>  	char nobody_uid[] = "nobody";
>  	struct passwd *ltpuser;
> -	int status;
>  	struct process_vm_params *params;
>  	pid_t child_pid;
>  	pid_t parent_pid;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int status;
> +
> +	tst_res(TINFO, "Testing invalid permissions on given PID");
>  
> -	tst_resm(TINFO, "test_invalid_perm");
>  	parent_pid = getpid();
> -	child_pid = fork();
> -	switch (child_pid) {
> -	case -1:
> -		tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup, "fork");
> -		break;
> -	case 0:
> -		ltpuser = getpwnam(nobody_uid);
> -		if (ltpuser == NULL)
> -			tst_brkm(TBROK | TERRNO, NULL, "getpwnam failed");
> -		SAFE_SETUID(NULL, ltpuser->pw_uid);
> -
> -		params = cma_alloc_sane_params();
> +	child_pid = SAFE_FORK();
> +	if (!child_pid) {
> +		ltpuser = SAFE_GETPWNAM(nobody_uid);
> +		SAFE_SETUID(ltpuser->pw_uid);
> +
> +		params = alloc_params();
>  		params->pid = parent_pid;
> -		cma_test_params(params);
> -		ret |= cma_check_ret(-1, TEST_RETURN);
> -		ret |= cma_check_errno(EPERM);
> -		cma_free_params(params);
> -		exit(ret);
> -	default:
> -		SAFE_WAITPID(cleanup, child_pid, &status, 0);
> -		if (!WIFEXITED(status) || WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0)
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "child returns %d", status);
> +		test_params(params);
> +		TST_EXP_EQ_LI(TST_RET, -1);
> +		check_errno(EPERM);
> +		free_params(params);
> +		return;
>  	}
> +
> +	SAFE_WAITPID(child_pid, &status, 0);

We want to use tst_reap_children() here which will check the exit
status.

In fact, if SAFE_WAITPID is removed altogether then the exit status will
be checked automatically at the end of the test when the lib calls
reap_children.

Otherwise LGTM!

-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-24 12:40 [LTP] [PATCH v1] Rewrite process_vm01 test using new LTP API Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-08-26  7:04 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2022-08-26  8:40   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-08-26  8:46     ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-08-26  8:50       ` Richard Palethorpe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-06 11:06 [LTP] [PATCH v1 0/3] Add process_madvise support Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-10-06 11:06 ` [LTP] [PATCH v1] Rewrite process_vm01 test using new LTP API Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2022-10-06 11:10   ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bks71nwg.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox