From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC26C433EF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E383C8D8B for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:37:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334DB3C25EC for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:37:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965E360070E for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:37:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF50B1FD39; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:37:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1637588247; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o7LOOToo7y1kdafhDLNvXfa9ykqRCEfbv5dMSGi1PqI=; b=cwDOsrn5U4REVKYg2tHu8moFg03rrK+G3O1SmxWcLhAg4EjsDFRtAy64owqAHApzKDCcb1 mOPgLzCgZti0FxJVSl7g3sw3OkOBBFZE7ott8BLr1aiAbKNNq0pqKcMwqAIAFJAuFeSJ+n a7z26xFzl8X0eD/YQR1uSfYWC9JBUh0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1637588247; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=o7LOOToo7y1kdafhDLNvXfa9ykqRCEfbv5dMSGi1PqI=; b=xdY9wq1cicZ4No7gnFsEXFhexFec+HOu+fWIoAIxplQJiUDNYsm9lk5kZHGxZNG+4b075F Z+p8mgl6YvVep2Ag== Received: from g78 (unknown [10.163.24.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6840A3B8B; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:37:27 +0000 (UTC) References: <20211117070708.2174932-1-liwang@redhat.com> <77e0b8b9-5de6-73ab-0f73-e3d95bad0935@jv-coder.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.9; emacs 27.2 From: Richard Palethorpe To: Li Wang Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 13:27:00 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87bl2cmhuw.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/3] lib: adding .supported_archs field in tst_test structure X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hello Li, Li Wang writes: > Hi All, > > By now, should I push this patch v5, or is any else change needed? I still don't understand how tst_arch.name is mapped to i386, i586 or i686? It appears that we will always get TCONF on any of these architectures because tst_arch.name will be set to x86 and the required arch will be i386, i586 or i686. > (From the above discussion I feel v5 is satisfied almost all of our > requirements.) Otherwise, yes, I agree. > > -- > Regards, > Li Wang -- Thank you, Richard. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp