public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] readahead02.c: Use fsync instead of sync
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 15:08:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fscawlku.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230116074101.1264-1-wegao@suse.com>

Hello,

Wei Gao via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it> writes:

> Use fsync on test file instead of sync should faster than syncing
> whole system.

The test completes in less than a second in OpenQA. We don't want to
risk introducing a regression or spend time reviewing changes unless the
performance improvement solves a timeout.

I suggest you convert dup06 to the new API (for example) or investigate
a test failure.

>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
> ---
>  .../kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c     | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
> index 7acf4bb18..e04046bc3 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/readahead/readahead02.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,17 @@ static void drop_caches(void)
>  	SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(DROP_CACHES_FNAME, "1");
>  }
>  
> +static void sync_drop_caches(void)
> +{
> +	int fd;
> +
> +	fd  = SAFE_OPEN(testfile, O_RDONLY);
> +	if (fsync(fd) == -1)
> +		tst_brk(TBROK | TERRNO, "fsync()");
> +	SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
> +	drop_caches();
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long get_bytes_read(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long ret;
> @@ -233,8 +244,7 @@ static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
>  	read_testfile(tc, 0, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes, &usec,
>  		      &cached);
>  	cached_high = get_cached_size();
> -	sync();
> -	drop_caches();
> +	sync_drop_caches();
>  	cached_low = get_cached_size();
>  	cached_max = MAX(cached_max, cached_high - cached_low);
>  
> @@ -246,8 +256,7 @@ static void test_readahead(unsigned int n)
>  	else
>  		cached = 0;
>  
> -	sync();
> -	drop_caches();
> +	sync_drop_caches();
>  	cached_low = get_cached_size();
>  	tst_res(TINFO, "read_testfile(1)");
>  	ret = read_testfile(tc, 1, testfile, testfile_size, &read_bytes_ra,
> -- 
> 2.35.3


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-16 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16  7:41 [LTP] [PATCH v1] readahead02.c: Use fsync instead of sync Wei Gao via ltp
2023-01-16 15:08 ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2023-01-17  2:22   ` Wei Gao via ltp
2023-01-17  9:23     ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-01-17 16:33       ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-01-17 16:50         ` Richard Palethorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fscawlku.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox