public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] Add simple Containerfile
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:42:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6nde7hu.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230928181124.GA309263@pevik>


Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> writes:

> Hi Richie,
>
> I suppose this is v2 of "[RFC] Add simple Alpine container" [1], thus I set [1]
> in patchwork as superseded.
>
> This LGTM, thanks! Minor comments below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>
>> This adds a regular container (or Docker) file which builds LTP from
>> source. This is initially intended for testing the LTP itself.
>
>> The resulting container has just the LTP installation and runtime
>> dependencies. However it is still quite large, probably due to debug
>> symbols.
>
>> The container can be built with a command like:
>
>> podman build -t tumbleweed/ltp \
>>        --build-arg PREFIX=registry.opensuse.org/opensuse/ \
>>        --build-arg DISTRO_NAME=tumbleweed \
>>        --build-arg DISTRO_RELEASE=20230925 .
>
>> Or just
>
>> podman build -t alpine/ltp .
>
>> It contains Kirk in /opt/kirk. So
>
>> cd /opt/kirk && ./kirk -f ltp -r syscalls
>
>> will run some tests.
>
>> Note a much smaller container can be found at:
>> https://registry.opensuse.org/cgi-bin/cooverview?srch_term=project%3D%5Ebenchmark+container%3D.*
>> This is created with SUSE's build system which does not use container files
>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
>> Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Marius Kittler <mkittler@suse.de>
>> ---
>
>> RFC comments:
>>     * Add git clean -fdX which should remove any build artifacts
>>       this is different from the suggestion of just doing a check. I just
>>       found it easier to remove the build files.
> FYI what we do in release scripts, is to do a local clone to a different
> directory [2]:
> git clone ltp ltp-full-YYYYMMDD
>
> Not sure what is faster.

I guess that is something a script could also do then 'git clean'
becomes a null op. git clean -X will only remove untracked files so
pending changes should get picked up. Which is probably what people want
during development. Doing a fresh checkout is probably more like a hard
reset and clean.

AFAICT git clean is very quick, far faster than 'make distclean'.

>
>>     * Added seperate alpine and tumbleweed runtime scripts. Again it's
>>       different from the suggestion just because it's easier to add
>>       seperate scripts than adding a switch
> +1
>
> But maybe put it into container directory, because it's not used in
> GitHub CI?

I was thinking it could be used in CI. All we need is a CI that runs VMs
and we can do some testing. (e.g. srchut).

>
>>     * Obviously a number of distros are missing runtime scripts. They can
>>       be added when someone is motivated to do so.
>
> +1
>
>> diff --git a/.dockerignore b/.dockerignore
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..bbcd7072f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/.dockerignore
>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>> +Containerfile
>> diff --git a/Containerfile b/Containerfile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..2f8192c3b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Containerfile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +ARG PREFIX=docker.io/
>> +ARG DISTRO_NAME=alpine
>> +ARG DISTRO_RELEASE=3.18
>> +
>> +FROM $PREFIX$DISTRO_NAME:$DISTRO_RELEASE AS build
>> +ARG LTPROOT=/opt/ltp
>> +ARG DISTRO_NAME=alpine
>> +ARG DISTRO_RELEASE=3.18
>> +
>> +RUN mkdir /build
>> +WORKDIR /build
>> +COPY . /build
>> +RUN ./ci/${DISTRO_NAME}.sh
>> +RUN git clean -fdX
>> +RUN ./build.sh -p $LTPROOT -i
>> +
>> +FROM $PREFIX$DISTRO_NAME:$DISTRO_RELEASE
>> +ARG LTPROOT=/opt/ltp
>> +ARG KIRKROOT=/opt/kirk
>> +ARG DISTRO_NAME=alpine
>> +
>> +COPY --from=build /build/ci/${DISTRO_NAME}-runtime.sh $LTPROOT/runtime-deps.sh
>> +RUN $LTPROOT/runtime-deps.sh
>> +
>> +COPY --from=build $LTPROOT $LTPROOT
>> +ENV LTPROOT=$LTPROOT
>> +ENV PATH=$LTPROOT/testcases/bin:$LTPROOT/bin:$PATH
>> +
>> +RUN mkdir -p $KIRKROOT
>> +COPY --from=build /build/tools/kirk $KIRKROOT
>> +
>> +USER ltp
>> diff --git a/ci/alpine-runtime.sh b/ci/alpine-runtime.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000..e4941f329
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/ci/alpine-runtime.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh -eux
>
> nit: out of curiosity, why -u (fail unset variables and parameters)?

I find it finds errors in shell scripts or when using them. E.g. typo's
in env variable names. I just include it wherever possible.

>> +
>> +apk add \
>> +        acl \
>> +        keyutils \
>> +        libaio \
>> +        libacl \
>> +        libcap \
>> +        libselinux \
>> +        libsepol \
>> +        libtirpc \
>> +        numactl \
>> +        openssl \
>> +        py3-msgpack
>
> I'd add more runtime packages (at least for syscalls).  If I manage next week to
> test this I might ask for more packages, but let's start with this

+1

>
> Kind regards,
> Petr
>
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230926090101.7565-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com/
> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/patch/20230927202121.300325-6-pvorel@suse.cz/


-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-29  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 10:44 [LTP] [PATCH] Add simple Containerfile Richard Palethorpe via ltp
2023-09-28 18:11 ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-29  7:42   ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]
2023-09-29  8:15     ` Petr Vorel
2023-09-29  9:15       ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-09-29  9:37         ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-04 12:28 ` Marius Kittler
2023-10-05  8:07   ` Richard Palethorpe
2023-10-10 11:28 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h6nde7hu.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox