public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [bug?] clone(CLONE_IO) failing after kernel commit commit ef2c41cf38a7
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 13:08:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pnbi3ai5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505095813.z7kakdbiwq7ewnmx@wittgenstein> (Christian Brauner's message of "Tue, 5 May 2020 11:58:13 +0200")

* Christian Brauner:

> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:36:36AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Christian Brauner:
>> >> Have any flags been added recently?
>> >
>> > /* Flags for the clone3() syscall. */
>> > #define CLONE_CLEAR_SIGHAND 0x100000000ULL /* Clear any signal handler and reset to SIG_DFL. */
>> > #define CLONE_INTO_CGROUP 0x200000000ULL /* Clone into a specific cgroup given the right permissions. */
>> 
>> Are those flags expected to be compatible with the legacy clone
>> interface on 64-bit architectures?
>
> No, they are clone3() only. clone() is deprecated wrt to new features.

But without masking the clone_flags argument, won't it be passed down
to the implementation which is also used to back clone3?

> If I understood the original mail correctly, then the issue is caused by
> an interaction with sign extension and a the new flag value
> CLONE_INTO_CGROUP being defined.

Could be, but for that to happen, the flag would have to be passed
down, no?

> So from what I gather from Jan's initial mail is that when clone() is
> called on ppc64le with the CLONE_IO|SIGCHLD flag:
> clone(do_child, stack+1024*1024, CLONE_IO|SIGCHLD, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> that the sign extension causes bits to be set that raise the
> CLONE_INTO_CGROUP flag. And since the do_fork() codepath is the same for
> legacy clone() and clone3() the kernel will think that someone requested
> CLONE_INTO_CGROUP but hasn't passed a valid fd to a cgroup. If that is
> the only issue here then couldn't we just do:
>
> clone_flags &= ~CLONE3_ONLY_FLAGS?
>
> and move on, i.e. all future clone3() flags we'll just remove since we
> can assume that they have been accidently set. Even if they have been
> intentionally set we can just ignore them since that's in line with
> legacy clone()'s (questionable) tradition of ignoring unknown flags.
> Thoughts? Or am I missing some subtlety here?

What's the difference between

  clone_flags &= ~CLONE3_ONLY_FLAGS;

and

  clone_flags &= (unsigned) -1;

in this context?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-05 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <100149681.11244932.1588661282331.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2020-05-05  7:28 ` [LTP] [bug?] clone(CLONE_IO) failing after kernel commit commit ef2c41cf38a7 Jan Stancek
2020-05-05  7:49   ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-05  7:59     ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05  8:02       ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05  8:32     ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05  8:58       ` Jan Stancek
2020-05-05  9:05       ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-05  9:15         ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05  9:36           ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-05  9:58             ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05 10:21               ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05 11:34                 ` Florian Weimer
2020-05-05 11:35                 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2020-05-05 11:43                   ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05 11:49                     ` Dmitry V. Levin
2020-05-05 11:57                       ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05 11:08               ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-05-05 11:26                 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-05  7:54   ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pnbi3ai5.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox