From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E3BC433EF for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C8F6139F for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 46C8F6139F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id B687E3C8853 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:00:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5673B3C87F6 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:00:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31581A014F9 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 15:00:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B8E212C7; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1637157628; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KT/SKDotJsuzJivdchNowopt/y7Dtf5xHx8bN37nfpM=; b=ZHjSu2mpNJkx9DSg4TpOi9z5etkpKSOjBOX3ND+oXuxqnuK8HSJuHssZuRg5PKn955dn9H vwyrli998j6adRXZNOmDM2pO5cEb7CdJ6GiPjEKa8Fv5cGfXtWfrTuLYI8KKH2H9qBoJhx OhqmQ0fiWMi6Ibz7h9un92lh1XaGwsc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1637157628; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KT/SKDotJsuzJivdchNowopt/y7Dtf5xHx8bN37nfpM=; b=wEz/weAXwNOH75wQZU9WxJdWZS5fH8OY8dPLTmuhLSI2Psh0bw5I3WC1OD15pl1pWSiPh9 sSAoIBQECMokEBDg== Received: from g78 (rpalethorpe.udp.ovpn1.nue.suse.de [10.163.24.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A166AA3B85; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 14:00:28 +0000 (UTC) References: <20211117070708.2174932-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20211117070708.2174932-3-liwang@redhat.com> <87v90r9idn.fsf@suse.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.9; emacs 27.2 From: Richard Palethorpe To: Li Wang Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 13:58:51 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87r1beanly.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v5 3/3] max_map_count: replace ifdefs by tst_arch X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hello Li, Li Wang writes: > Hi Richard, > > > > + case TST_IA64: > > + /* On ia64, the vdso is not a proper mapping */ > > + if (!strcmp(buf, "[vdso]")) > > + return true; > > + break; > > + case TST_ARM: > > + /* Skip it when run it in aarch64 */ > > This should not be possible. If TST_ARM is set then how can we be on > aarch64? We also have TST_AARCH64. > > Not exactly, I was thinking like this before, but as Cyril point that there is > a possible 32bit ARM binary runs on 64bit aarch64 kernel. > > https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2021-November/025925.html Thanks Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe -- Thank you, Richard. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp