From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F2BACE79AD for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B3753CDEB9 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:44:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F1573CA3D7 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64851615C0F for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CBC22638 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:44:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1695195847; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5refSPTV/RQSRGMaHkbCi151rrDCmFcIVVIxJKwHv7c=; b=GOnuYhZcAKATNwvIoWG3R9JHNBQKdZsT5VOme/sNKqsl/GbJXGdeIj4Ik/6aR7nKSytC6v s9FmW4hkyQithYjRDSS8st2zZlVl9Oco9l9BluF2F2f+7Jpham4inYasabsJhvjQ9j5uNG uUrbTTg3KKWNWobjzgRxlEorHakz294= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1695195847; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5refSPTV/RQSRGMaHkbCi151rrDCmFcIVVIxJKwHv7c=; b=BgaYQbHt2aFPxSDTjOwJaqgE6rHqjs8CG4v7oOqUJB5X/84WmhF5+1bisqBU0Qk72vaPud kY5kEzhLxP7YTBDg== Received: from g78 (rpalethorpe.tcp.ovpn1.nue.suse.de [10.163.17.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18BAF2C143; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:44:07 +0000 (UTC) References: <20230919083827.8423-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: Richard Palethorpe To: Martin Doucha Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:41:10 +0100 Organization: Linux Private Site In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87sf79ffw9.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] kvm: Fix Nix build failure by moving -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hello, Martin Doucha writes: > Hi, > pvorel should have a look whether it doesn't break the other systems > where -fno-stack-protector is needed, but otherwise: > > Reviewed-by: Martin Doucha Compilation appears to be fine: https://github.com/richiejp/ltp/actions/runs/6232857602/job/16916865952 The tests just TCONF on my hardware, but I guess the risk of breaking the test at runtime is low? -- Thank you, Richard. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp