From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36C4ECDB474 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DBA3CECAA for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF563CB4A2 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:20:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8268C600669 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B249021AB4; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from g78 (unknown [10.163.25.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FA32CF38; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:20:34 +0000 (UTC) References: <875y33vsks.fsf@suse.de> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 From: Richard Palethorpe To: Cyril Hrubis Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:10:37 +0100 Organization: Linux Private Site In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87wmvdvjfz.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (smtp-out1.suse.de: 149.44.160.134 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rpalethorpe@suse.de) smtp.mailfrom=rpalethorpe@suse.de X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.76 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[rpalethorpe@suse.de]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[149.44.160.134:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-3.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.20)[suse.de]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.60)[~all:c]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.20)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.03)[56.37%] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B249021AB4 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.1 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] LTP open monthly meeting X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hello, Cyril Hrubis writes: > Hi! >> For me is (UTC + 8:00) available, I think it should be fine, >> I always meet with European colleagues online. But I would >> mark that as optional to me, to avoid conflict with other activities. >> >> Btw, should we create a channel to talk in type first? >> >> I have dropped use IRC for a period of time, maybe a channel >> with chat history would be better. e.g. Slack or googlechat. > > I'm kind of discouraged to run one more chat client on my machines. I > guess that in order to make things simpler if we are going to go for > another chat solution, it should include irc bridge, from that point of > view I would avoid Slack and googlechat. > > Maybe we can try to set up matrix channel with IRC bridge, however I > have no idea if there is a suitable free server for that. I am already forced to use Discord by a couple of communities, it supports text and voice, it's better than Slack, so that could be an option to cover everything. -- Thank you, Richard. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp