public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add goals of patch review and tips
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 09:13:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zg2gddsx.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZOYPNYnSqc2geOmR@yuki>

Hello,

Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> writes:

> Hi!
>> >> +The following are examples and may not be appropriate for all tests.
>> >> +
>> >> +* Merge the patch. It should apply cleanly to master.
>> 
>> As a newbie with LTP I am still struggling to understand some things
>> like this one. How is possible to merge to master in order to review?
>
> Obviously you do that to your local git tree. This is basics of git
> development nothing specific to LTP here.

I suppose it would not hurt to add "to your local copy of the master
branch". It's only a few more words that would clean it up (IMO). If
that doesn't make sense then you will have to do a search or ask someone
because this document can't be too long.

>
>> >> +## How to get patches merged
>> 
>> Again from my POV the description is more about what you should do as a
>> reviewer than how to get a patch merged.
>
> Isn't that the same? If you know what are developers doing in order to
> catch common mistakes you can as well avoid doing them...
>

Perhaps we are not doing a good job of marketing patch review in this
document, but it is probably also outside the scope of this document.

>> >> +Once you think a patch is good enough you should add your Reviewed-by
>> >> +and/or Tested-by tags. This means you will get some credit for getting
>> >> +the patch merged. Also some blame if there are problems.
>> >> +
>> >> +If you ran the test you can add the Tested-by tag. If you read the
>> >> +code or used static analysis tools on it, you can add the Reviewed-by
>> >> +tag.
>> >> +
>> >> +In addition you can expect others to review your patches and add their
>> >> +tags. This will speed up the process of getting your patches merged.
>> >> +
>> >> +## Maintainers Checklist
>> >
>> > Looks very nice, thanks for writing this out.
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Cyril Hrubis
>> > chrubis@suse.cz
>> 
>> I feel that this is more an overview and reminder of already
>> contributors. Not sure how helpful is it for new comers like myself
>
> I think that there are different levels of newcommers. I do not think
> that the documment is supposed to help newcommers that are already
> familiar with how git based development works and only highlights
> things that are specific to LTP.

Yup, there is a long tutorial which explains in depth a lot of stuff and
this could be expanded, but I don't have time for that right now.

-- 
Thank you,
Richard.

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

      reply	other threads:[~2023-08-24  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-22 10:13 [LTP] [PATCH v2] Add goals of patch review and tips Richard Palethorpe via ltp
2023-08-22 14:18 ` Avinesh Kumar
2023-08-23 10:03 ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-08-23 13:37   ` iob via ltp
2023-08-23 13:52     ` Cyril Hrubis
2023-08-24  8:13       ` Richard Palethorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zg2gddsx.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=rpalethorpe@suse.de \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox