Re: [LTP] New LTP documentation!

[Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>]

Hi,

On 4/11/24 11:00, Li Wang wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 6:12 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     > Hi Andrea,
>
>     > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 8:41 PM Andrea Cervesato via ltp
>     <ltp@lists.linux.it>
>     > wrote:
>
>     > > Hello everyone,
>
>     > > as already mentioned in the monthly LTP meeting, Linux Test
>     Project
>     > > lacks of a nice and clean documentation that can be easily
>     accessed by
>     > > users, developers and maintainers.
>     > > The current LTP documentation is also not matching with our
>     expectancy
>     > > towards the entire project, which is has been heavily
>     refactored and it
>     > > has changed in the past years, providing a higher quality code
>     and new
>     > > testing features.
>
>     > > For this reasons, we think it's time to move forward and to start
>     > > working on documentation, helping people to use, to develop and to
>     > > maintain LTP in an easier way, increasing quality of the
>     overall project
>     > > and to call more developers in the community.
>
>     > > I started to work on documentation refactoring, re-organizing the
>     > > overall structure. The first prototype can be found here:
>
>     > > https://ltp-acerv.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
>
>
>     > Looks great! Thanks for bringing this.
>
>     > And I just tried that the latest LTP compiled & executed succeed on
>     > RHEL-7.9.
>     > Can you update the "Oldest tested distributions" [1] part by adding:
>
>     >   RHEL-7.9 Maipo (Distro)  3.10 (kernel)  4.8.5(gcc)
>     2.17(glibc)  -(clang)
>
>     Although in the original docs, the table was not under section
>     "Build testing
>     with GitHub Actions", I assumed it's clear we talk about GitHub
>     Actions testing.
>     That's why I put there only distros we actually have in
>     .github/workflows/ci.yml
>     and not e.g. SLE12-SP2 which we test with latest LTP release.
>
>     I actually find useful to stand which distros we test privately,
>     but this info
>     should be obvious (either add a column "CI", where would be
>     "GitHub Actions" or
>     "RHEL private CI" or whatever.
>
>
>
>     @Li Andrea put there as new info: "Minimal supported kernel
>     version is 3.10."
>     which is not in old docs. Do you really test RHEL-7.9 (3.10 based)
>     with the
>     latest LTP release?
>
>
> Yes, I did but only checked on RHEL-7.9 with x86_64 and s390x
> (compile & execution well) last time.
>
> After rebuilding the latest branch on all arches, I found the rest 
> arches have
> problems in compiling (forgive me careless last time).
>
> Now I am hesitant to fix the error or raise the baseline to RHEL8.3.
> (I talked to colleagues and got to know they always chose to use fixed 
> versions of LTP when <=RHEL8.2).
>
>
> ---------------------
> # 3.10.0-1136.el7.ppc64le
>
> # glibc-2.17-316.el7.ppc64le
>
> In file included from /usr/include/termios.h:40:0,
>                   from /usr/include/bits/ioctl-types.h:5,
>                   from /usr/include/sys/ioctl.h:29,
>                   from ../../../../include/lapi/ioctl.h:11,
>                   from ioctl02.c:31:
> /usr/include/bits/termios.h:33:8: error: redefinition of ‘struct termios’
>   struct termios {
>          ^
> In file included from ioctl02.c:29:0:
> /usr/include/asm/termbits.h:22:8: note: originally defined here
>   struct termios {
>          ^
>
>
>     @Yang Xu I found you removed fallbacks up to kernel 3.10:
>
>     06ada0329 ("Remove old kernel version check when using min_kver
>     under 3.10")
>     862d94c45 ("Remove old kernel version check when using tst_kvercmp
>     under 3.10")
>     971828c00 ("shell: Remove old kernel version check below 3.10")
>
>     Hopefully I haven't overlook anything.
>
>     @Andrea: Also, I would prefer to put back paragraph "1. Build
>     testing with
>     GitHub Actions". I'll send a patch, to force myself to learn
>     building new docs.
>
Feel free, I think it's a good idea. At the moment there's just a short 
comment about Github actions here:

https://linux-test-project.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developers/writing_tests.html#testing-builds-with-github-actions


>
>     Kind regards,
>     Petr
>
>     > [1]
>     https://ltp-acerv.readthedocs.io/en/latest/users/supported_systems.html
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Li Wang


-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp