public inbox for ltp@lists.linux.it
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mq_open: fix limits for queues_max
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:50:47 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <956936356.5228861.1487177447794.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170215152406.GB29673@rei.lan>



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cyril Hrubis" <chrubis@suse.cz>
> To: "Xiao Yang" <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, "Jan Stancek" <jstancek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 15 February, 2017 4:24:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mq_open: fix limits for queues_max
> 
> Hi!
> > This case fails on RHEL6.8GA and RHEL6.9Beta, because setting
> > queues_max to 0 is invalid.  the minimum value of queues_max
> > has been limitted to 1 on some distributions, Please see the
> > following kernel commit:
> > 
> > commit 5b5c4d1a1440e94994c73dddbad7be0676cd8b9a

since RHEL6.2

> > Author: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
> > Date:   Thu May 31 16:26:30 2012 -0700
> > 
> > 	ipc/mqueue: update maximums for the mqueue subsystem
> > 
> > We set queues_max to 1 instead of 0, so this case can work on RHEL6.
> 
> First I think that you have wrong commit, the one that actually added
> the limits was:
> 
> commit 93e6f119c0ce8a1bba6e81dc8dd97d67be360844

since RHEL6.2

> Author: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
> Date:   Thu May 31 16:26:28 2012 -0700
> 
>     ipc/mqueue: cleanup definition names and locations
> 
> Since this commit changes the proc handler in sysctl table and adds the
> minimum
> and maximum values there.
> 
> Secondly these limits were removed in:
> 
> commit a5c5928b759d8c7382cccc7be36769a68046cc58

doesn't seem to present in any RHEL6 kernel

> Author: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date:   Fri Jun 6 14:38:07 2014 -0700
> 
>     ipc: convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
> 
> 
> I'm not sure if this is worth the effort.
> 
> Jan what do you think, should we apply this to fix the test on RHEL6?

I would like this to work with RHEL6, but it be good to understand
why failures started for Xiao only now.

I'm looking at results of kernel-2.6.32-694.el6 (6.9), and it's passing:
<<<test_start>>>
tag=mq_open01 stime=1487065446
cmdline="mq_open01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
EXPECT: return value(ret)=(N >= 0) errno=0 (Success)
RESULT: return value(ret)=       7 errno=0 (Success)
mq_open01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) START
mq_open01    0  TINFO  :  mq_maxmsg E:20,	R:20
mq_open01    0  TINFO  :  mq_msgsize E:16384,	R:16384
mq_open01    0  TINFO  :  (case00) END => OK
mq_open01    1  TPASS  :  mq_open call succeeded 
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=0
<<<test_end>>>

I'll try 6.8 too.

Regards,
Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-15 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-06 12:42 [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/mq_open: fix limits for queues_max Xiao Yang
2017-02-15  1:26 ` Xiao Yang
2017-02-15 15:24 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-15 16:50   ` Jan Stancek [this message]
2017-02-15 18:19     ` Jan Stancek
2017-02-16  9:37       ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-02-16  1:20   ` Xiao Yang
2017-02-16  2:38   ` [LTP] [PATCH v2] " Xiao Yang
2017-02-16  9:28     ` Cyril Hrubis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=956936356.5228861.1487177447794.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
    --to=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox